Hydroponic spinach

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:36 pm
Thanked: 99 times
Followed by:21 members

Hydroponic spinach

by vk_vinayak » Wed Sep 05, 2012 4:01 am
Near Chicago a newly built hydroponic spinach "factory," a completely controlled environment for growing spinach, produces on 1 acre of floor space what it takes 100 acres of fields to produce. Expenses, especially for electricity, are high, however, and the spinach produced costs about four times as much as washed California field spinach, the spinach commonly sold throughout the United States.

Which of the following, if true, best supports the projection that the spinach-growing facility near Chicago will be profitable?

(A) Once the operators of the facility are experienced, they will be able to cut operating expenses by about 25 percent.
(B) There is virtually no scope for any further reduction in the cost per pound for California field spinach.
(C) Unlike washed field spinach, the hydropoincally grown spinach is untainted by any pesticides or herbicides and thus will sell at exceptionally high prices to such customers as health food restaurants.
(D) Since spinach is a crop that ships relatively well, the market for the hydroponically grown spinach is no more limited to the Chicago area than the market for California field spinach is to California.
(E) A second hydroponic facility is being built in Canada, taking advantage of inexpensive electricity and high vegetable prices.

Explain your reasoning for each option.

OA: Later.
- VK

I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
Location: New York
Thanked: 660 times
Followed by:266 members
GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Wed Sep 05, 2012 10:14 am
Once costs have been set, we need to find an answer that deals with the ability to generate revenue with the spinach...

(A) Doesn't matter if they can't sell it.
(B) We don't care about Cali spinach, just rev of Chicago...
(C) Bingo... We can earn a good buck for the spinach
(D) Doesn't matter if people won't buy it.
(E) We still need people to buy Chicago spinach. No help

Answer = C
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:27 am
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:16 members

by alex.gellatly » Wed Sep 05, 2012 5:24 pm
vk_vinayak wrote:Near Chicago a newly built hydroponic spinach "factory," a completely controlled environment for growing spinach, produces on 1 acre of floor space what it takes 100 acres of fields to produce. Expenses, especially for electricity, are high, however, and the spinach produced costs about four times as much as washed California field spinach, the spinach commonly sold throughout the United States. So our argument goes as follows: They can make spinach using less land but it cots 4x as much to produce (due to production costs). Question: How can they sell it? Answer will be something that makes the operation profitable. For example, it is better, healthier, or has cheaper transportation costs to the east or something

Which of the following, if true, best supports the projection that the spinach-growing facility near Chicago will be profitable?

(A) Once the operators of the facility are experienced, they will be able to cut operating expenses by about 25 percent. This is incorrect. Although it cuts cost by 24% this will NOT offset the 4x operation expense. It is still cheaper in California.
(B) There is virtually no scope for any further reduction in the cost per pound for California field spinach. This is incorrect. We don't care about Californian spinach. Even if California can't reduce its clots anymore, it is still 4x cheaper than Chicagoan.
(C) Unlike washed field spinach, the hydropoincally grown spinach is untainted by any pesticides or herbicides and thus will sell at exceptionally high prices to such customers as health food restaurants. This is the correct answer. It says that, despite such high costs, there is a market for Chicagoan spinach. Thus, the operation is economically viable.
(D) Since spinach is a crop that ships relatively well, the market for the hydroponically grown spinach is no more limited to the Chicago area than the market for California field spinach is to California. This is incorrect because it does not explain how/why Chicagoan spinach will be economically viable.
(E) A second hydroponic facility is being built in Canada, taking advantage of inexpensive electricity and high vegetable prices. This is incorrect because the questions specifically asks for the "factory" in Chicago. So... this is irrelevant.
C should be the correct answer.
Let me know if this helps
A useful website I found that has every quant OG video explanation:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/useful-websi ... tml#475231