BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

three and four digit numbers

Expert replies
by alex.gellatly » Mon May 21, 2012 7:50 pm
The numbers x and y are three-digit positive integers, and x+y is a four-digit integer. The tens digit of x equals 7 and the tens digit of y equals 5. If x<y, which of the following must be true?

I. The units digit of x + y is greater than the units digit of either x or y.
II. The tens digit of x + y equals 2.
III. The hundreds digit of y is at least 5.

A. II only
B. III only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III

Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by aneesh.kg » Mon May 21, 2012 7:59 pm
alex.gellatly wrote:The numbers x and y are three-digit positive integers, and x+y is a four-digit integer. The tens digit of x equals 7 and the tens digit of y equals 5. If x<y, which of the following must be true?

I. The units digit of x + y is greater than the units digit of either x or y.
II. The tens digit of x + y equals 2.
III. The hundreds digit of y is at least 5.

A. II only
B. III only
C. I and II
D. I and III
E. II and III

Thanks
x and y are both between 500 and 999. The problem is using the phrase 'must be true' so even one instance where a statement does not hold true is sufficient to rule it out.

(I) is ruled out because when the units place of both x and y is 0, the units place of (x + y) is also 0. For example: x= 570 and y =650
(II) is ruled for this example: x = 576 and y = 656 because x + y will have 3 has the tens digit in this case

No need to check (III) because none of the options says that none of the statements could be true.

[spoiler](B)[/spoiler] is correct.
Aneesh Bangia
GMAT Math Coach
[email protected]

GMATPad:
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/GMATPad
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon May 21, 2012 9:26 pm
aneesh.kg wrote: x and y are both between 500 and 999.
Hi!

Is there a reason why we couldn't have x=170 and y=850?

In order for x+y to be a 4 digit number, at least one of the two must be greater than 500 (and the hundreds digits must sum to at least 9), but both don't need to be greater than 500.

Fortunately, that issue doesn't cause any problems with these particular statements and the rest of your reasoning is excellent!
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by aneesh.kg » Mon May 21, 2012 10:10 pm
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:
aneesh.kg wrote: x and y are both between 500 and 999.
Hi!

Is there a reason why we couldn't have x=170 and y=850?

In order for x+y to be a 4 digit number, at least one of the two must be greater than 500 (and the hundreds digits must sum to at least 9), but both don't need to be greater than 500.

Fortunately, that issue doesn't cause any problems with these particular statements and the rest of your reasoning is excellent!
Ah no, My bad! I was fortunate indeed.
Thanks Stuart for pointing it out.
Aneesh Bangia
GMAT Math Coach
[email protected]

GMATPad:
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/GMATPad
Join the discussion