- sachin_yadav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:52 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:1 members
Growing competitive pressures may be encouraging auditors to bend the rules in favor of clients; auditors may, for instance, allow a questionable loan to remain on the books in order to maintain a bank's profits on paper.
(A) clients; auditors may, for instance, allow
(B) clients, as an instance, to allow
(C) clients, like to allow
(D) clients, such as to be allowing
(E) clients; which might, as an instance, be the allowing of
Answer is A
Hi,
I really apologize if this question has been posted again. I am not able to understand why B is wrong ? I got few web links, and they all say it is a run-on-sentence. How can choice B a run-on-sentence. Isn't run-on-sentence occurs when two independent clauses are joined together with a comma, such as, I eat, I sleep is a run-on sentence ?
The first part Growing competitive pressures........in favor of clients is generalization and second part is an example of the generalization or supporting the first part.
Not sure why choice B is wrong. What about absence of "may" in choice B? Does this word also affect the sentence?
I eliminated this choice because i thought it is changing the meaning of the sentence. Second, there is no subject and verb.
Thanks & Regards
Sachin
(A) clients; auditors may, for instance, allow
(B) clients, as an instance, to allow
(C) clients, like to allow
(D) clients, such as to be allowing
(E) clients; which might, as an instance, be the allowing of
Answer is A
Hi,
I really apologize if this question has been posted again. I am not able to understand why B is wrong ? I got few web links, and they all say it is a run-on-sentence. How can choice B a run-on-sentence. Isn't run-on-sentence occurs when two independent clauses are joined together with a comma, such as, I eat, I sleep is a run-on sentence ?
The first part Growing competitive pressures........in favor of clients is generalization and second part is an example of the generalization or supporting the first part.
Not sure why choice B is wrong. What about absence of "may" in choice B? Does this word also affect the sentence?
I eliminated this choice because i thought it is changing the meaning of the sentence. Second, there is no subject and verb.
Thanks & Regards
Sachin












