BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A newborn kangaroo --- knewton

Expert replies
by atulmangal » Thu May 19, 2011 11:38 pm
A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?


(A) All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.

(B) Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.

(C) If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact.

(D) Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.

(E) Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by champmag » Fri May 20, 2011 1:18 am
I zeroed on to B and D.

IMO:B

the 'only' in D is confusing.
Join the discussion

by HSPA » Fri May 20, 2011 2:34 am
atulmangal wrote:A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey's hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother's pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers' pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?


(A) All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.

(B) Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.

(C) If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact.

(D) Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth. [It is kangaroo who does this not the Lion]
(E) Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.[/quote]
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri May 20, 2011 4:51 am
OA is E
Join the discussion

by champmag » Sat May 21, 2011 7:49 am
I got my mistake.

Thanx HSPA.
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Sat May 21, 2011 10:07 am
Hi,

Is the option D wrong because of the use of "lions that"?????????
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Mon May 23, 2011 4:04 am
atulmangal wrote:OA is E
Hi Atul,

can you pls post Official Explanation.

I could not understand how E is the right answer.
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by itsmebharat » Fri May 27, 2011 5:37 am
Please post the official explanation or if someone explain more clearly it would great.
I am confused between the D and E options, rest are wrong because of following reasons

(A) All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.

(B) Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.
irrelevant

(C) If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother's pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact.
out of scope

(D) Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers' pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.

(E) Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelegs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.
I am not an Expert, please feel free to suggest if there is an error.
Join the discussion