BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

main point

Expert replies
by bleacherseat » Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:20 am
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.


Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?


(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Jatinder » Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:06 am
A equally serious distortions. - Never stated
B -Could be
C - No Info regarding this
D-Well meaning...No support
E-- Seems Correct as the structure is...conclusion and then evidence

SO IMO E
Join the discussion

by kris610 » Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:18 pm
IMO B.

A--The argument clearly states "Johnson's more faithful..." which rules out "equally serious.." stated in A.

B. This is the author's point.


C and D as stated by Jatinder.

E-- I believe the author's main concern here is talking about Johnson and his interpretation of the manuscripts, even though the author supports Johnson's view of the other editors.
Join the discussion

by bleacherseat » Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:36 pm
OA IS B
Join the discussion

by Jatinder » Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:15 pm
OOOPs...

Thanks Kris..

Moreover, we can eliminate E as decipering of punctuation is under discussion rather than "deciphering of the whole manuscript"
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Thu May 12, 2016 1:11 pm
Answer B seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Join the discussion