BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Help understanding idiom 'dated at'

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:55 am
Thanked: 12 times
by wayofjungle » Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:58 pm
For those that havent learned this yet, the GMAT treats the term 'date' as an idiom, which must be used in the form "dated at". This seems particularly troubling when using logical reasoning if not familiar with the idiom. Can someone confirm that the meaning or usage on these following examples is correct? ('meaning or usage' is singluar right?)

The artifact was dated at 12 B.C. <- The artifact was dated during the year 12 B.C.
The artifact was dated at 2023 years old. <- The artifact is thought to be 2023 years old.
They dated the archive at 12 years old. <- The group dated the archive when they were 12 years old.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 amFollowed by: 34 members
Thanked: 156 times
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:36 pm
Depends on the intended meaning. Usually SC questions will clearly tell you what is the context of date.

dated at is used to indicate the age of an object or a fossil. Remember carbon dating?

But in the following example,
The memo, dated 12th May, .... Here it indicates the date of creation of the memo.

In your example,
They dated the archive at 12 years old. <- The group dated the archive when they were 12 years old.
here, If the intended meaning is to say the archive is 12 years, then the usage is okay.
But if you are saying the "they" were 12 years old, then it is wrong.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 amFollowed by: 53 members
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times

by Frankenstein » Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:11 pm
wayofjungle wrote:For those that havent learned this yet, the GMAT treats the term 'date' as an idiom, which must be used in the form "dated at". This seems particularly troubling when using logical reasoning if not familiar with the idiom. Can someone confirm that the meaning or usage on these following examples is correct? ('meaning or usage' is singluar right?)

The artifact was dated at 12 B.C. <- The artifact was dated during the year 12 B.C.
The artifact was dated at 2023 years old. <- The artifact is thought to be 2023 years old.
They dated the archive at 12 years old. <- The group dated the archive when they were 12 years old.
Hi,
dated at - to denote a time period
date from - to have an existence that extends from a particular time
dated to - is followed by date
So, The artifact was dated to 12 B.C. <- The artifact was dated during the year 12 B.C.
The artifact was dated at 2023 years old. <- The artifact is thought to be 2023 years old.
They dated the archive at 12 years old. <- The group dated the archive when they were 12 years old.(Incorrect)
They dated the archive at 12 years old. = The archive has been dated at 12 years old.
The archives date from the early 90s.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1