MANGROVES (#54 from OG Verbal Review)

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:690

MANGROVES (#54 from OG Verbal Review)

by Arsene Lupin » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:16 pm
Neotropical coastal mangrove forests are usually "zonal," with certain mangrove species found predominantly in the seaward portion of the habitat and other mangrove species on the more landward portions of the coast. The earliest research on mangrove forests produced descriptions of species distribution from shore to land, without exploring the causes of the distributions.

The idea that zonation is caused by plant succession was first expressed by J. H. Davis in a study of Florida mangrove forests. According to Davis' scheme, the shoreline is being extended in a seaward direction because of the "land-building" role of mangroves, which, by trapping sediments over time, extend the shore. As a habitat gradually becomes more inland as the shore extends, the "land-building" species are replaced. This continuous process of accretion and succession would be interrupted only by hurricanes or storm flushings.

Recently the universal application of Davis's succession paradigm has been challenged. It appears that in areas where weak currents and weak tidal energies allow the accumulation of sediments, mangroves will follow land formation and accelerate the rate of soil accretion; succession will proceed according to Davis's scheme. But on stable coastlines, the distribution of mangrove species results in other patterns of zonation; "land building" does not occur.

To find a principle that explains the various distribution patterns, several researchers have looked to salinity and its effects on mangrove. While mangroves can develop in fresh water, they can also thrive in salinities as high as 2.5 times that of seawater. However, those mangrove species found in freshwater habitats do well only in the absence of competition, thus suggesting that salinity tolerance is a critical factor in competitive success among mangrove species. Research suggests that mangroves will normally dominate highly saline regions, although not because they require salt. Rather, they are metabolically efficient (and hence grow well) in portions of an environment whose high salinity excludes plants adapted to lower salinities. Tides create different degrees of salinity along a coastline. The characteristic mangrove species of each zone should exhibit a higher metabolic efficiency at that salinity than will any potential invader, including other species of mangrove.

=========================

It can be inferred from the passage that Davis' paradigm does NOT apply to which of the following?
(A) The shoreline of Florida mangrove forests first studies by Davis
(B) A shoreline in an area with weak currents
(C) A shoreline in an area with weak idal energy
(D) A shoreline extended by "land-building" species of mangrove
(E) A shoreline in which few sediments can accumulate



QA: E

How can [spoiler]E be correct when sediment accumulation helps the land-building process? [/spoiler]

:cry:
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:30 am
Thanked: 19 times

by bharathh » Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:21 pm
I believe this line from the passage answers the question:

. But on stable coastlines, the distribution of mangrove species results in other patterns of zonation; "land building" does not occur.

Stable coastlines mean no landbuilding... which means no sediments are accrued.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:690

by Arsene Lupin » Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:58 am
That doesn't seem to deal with the question mate. I believe this line has the answer:
It appears that in areas where weak currents and weak tidal energies allow the accumulation of sediments, mangroves will follow land formation and accelerate the rate of soil accretion; succession will proceed according to Davis's scheme.
Notice that all the three underlined parts help in creating the process described by Davis's scheme. And this is exactly why the official guide discarded choices B and C. However, the OG picked E as the correct answer with no clear explanation.

Is it wrong because of the word "few"? (In the sense that "few" sediments are not enough to create the process)

Legendary Member
Posts: 1035
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:56 pm
Thanked: 104 times
Followed by:1 members

by scoobydooby » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:02 am
yes, i guess you are right. few would mean "not enough/hardy any". "few" is different from "a few/some"

=>weak currents/tides-accumulation of sediments-land building process- zonation as per David's scheme

=>sediment accumulation leads to zonation.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Sep 03, 2009 10:43 am
I concor with Scooby....few means almost none in GMAT :-)...so E is correct..