Working with multiple materials, will it add value?

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:51 am
Location: Chennai
Ive been studying with multiple materials such as princeton, arco, kaplan, OG, manhattan and other local publishers books.

I found that CR answers and logic used for deriving answers in each book differs ( or i might not have perceived clearly) and it makes me think whether studying RC and CR using multiple books enhance the performance or degrade the performance?
Regards
Arun
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1018
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:19 pm
Thanked: 86 times
Followed by:6 members

by mayonnai5e » Mon May 26, 2008 10:40 pm
My opinion is that it depends on when you do the problems from each. I started with PR materials then went to Kaplan, Veritas and finally OG materials. Once I had started working the OG problems and became familiar with the way the test writers "think" I definitely 100% noticed a difference between OG verbal and all other verbal materials. This was particularly the case with the 1000 series questions.

To answer your question, I think it is actually dangerous to use certain materials after the OG because once you become familiar with OG, you should notice your mind shifting to "think" like a test writer, but some other materials have the opposite effect. I avoided the 1000 materials like the plague after I realized this.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/my-blog-erro ... t4899.html
550 =\ ...560 =\... 650 =) ...570 =( ...540 =*( ...680 =P ... 670 =T ...=T... 650 =T ...700 =) ..690 =) ...710 =D ...GMAT 720 DING!! ;D

Learn more about me