DS help

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

DS help

by gmat25 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 5:48 am
Image


OA given is Op C, however, i believe Op A is itself sufficient irrespective of sign etc. [/img]
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Sun Jul 24, 2011 7:09 am
Can you post your method and solution that helps you with A? Maybe then we can see if it works.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat25 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 7:36 am
vineeshp wrote:Can you post your method and solution that helps you with A? Maybe then we can see if it works.
Well i tried the cases, for Op A, if p = r, then i replaced r with p in the given question. first of all if u notice sign play no role here as both sides will gonna have same sign. That means the only cases u need to check are

case 1:-- r = p > 1

case 2:-- 0 < r = p < 1

In both these cases i find the eq'n holds true hence Op A

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Sun Jul 24, 2011 8:18 am
gmat25 wrote:
vineeshp wrote:Can you post your method and solution that helps you with A? Maybe then we can see if it works.
Well i tried the cases, for Op A, if p = r, then i replaced r with p in the given question. first of all if u notice sign play no role here as both sides will gonna have same sign. That means the only cases u need to check are

case 1:-- r = p > 1

case 2:-- 0 < r = p < 1

In both these cases i find the eq'n holds true hence Op A
Hi,
Why didn't you consider the case r<0? For r<0, the sign of inequality changes because 1/r - 1/(r^2+2) = 2/r(r^2+2). It's sign depends on the sign of r.
If you have considered only r>0, that means you are in fact considering statement(2) as well. Hence, the answer should be C.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:7 members

by Ozlemg » Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:41 am
It is C.
Thank you Frankestain...You are cut out for maths.
And you are my e-gmat-idol hehe :)
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:57 am
Thanked: 17 times
Followed by:1 members

by gmat25 » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:45 am
Frankenstein wrote:
gmat25 wrote:
vineeshp wrote:Can you post your method and solution that helps you with A? Maybe then we can see if it works.
Well i tried the cases, for Op A, if p = r, then i replaced r with p in the given question. first of all if u notice sign play no role here as both sides will gonna have same sign. That means the only cases u need to check are

case 1:-- r = p > 1

case 2:-- 0 < r = p < 1

In both these cases i find the eq'n holds true hence Op A
Hi,
Why didn't you consider the case r<0? For r<0, the sign of inequality changes because 1/r - 1/(r^2+2) = 2/r(r^2+2). It's sign depends on the sign of r.
If you have considered only r>0, that means you are in fact considering statement(2) as well. Hence, the answer should be C.
I took r < 0 as case earlier but unfortunately made a silly mistake...thanks