Answer should be "E".
product of any three consecutive numbers is always divisible by 3. so statement 1 doest not gives us any info. statement 2 also does not add any value.
faster method please1
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Data Sufficiency |
-
gauravkhare
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 10:32 am
- Thanked: 1 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
If the original answer is A, you haven't typed out the question correctly. You've typed:raunekk wrote:sorry dude..OA= A
And i got d answer by plugging numbers..
any alternative tips or method..
anyone??
1) b is a multiple of 3
We know b is the product of three consecutive integers from the question, and therefore know that b must be divisible by 3! = 6 (that's a very useful fact to understand: the product of n consecutive integers is always divisible by n!). As written, statement 1) gives us no new information. If the OA to the question is A, then statement 1) surely is supposed to read:
1) b is a multiple of 8
Then, since we know b is divisible by 8 and by 3, b must be divisible by LCM of 8 and 3, or 24. So with this adjustment, statement 1 is sufficient.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
To the question you've given, I guarantee you that A is not the correct answer- don't trust everything you read on internet GMAT forums! It's sufficient if you change '3' to '8' in Statement 1, but as written, it certainly is not sufficient. As explained above, statement 2 is not sufficient either: c could be 1 (and b would then not be divisible by 24), or c could be 7 (and b would be divisible by 24).
-
ildude02
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:00 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
Ian, I have a question with reagrds to multiples in this same regard,
Say if X is a multiple of Y; and if in an toher statment says, X is a multiple of Z; Now when we combine both the statemetns, can we assume that X MUST be a multiple of of the LCM of Y and Z; assuming X, Y and Z are integers. I think at one point I made the mistake of thinking X will be a mutlitple of the product of YZ instead of the LCM. Just wanted to confirm this. Also, in the same reagrd, how do we treat factors. Say Y is a factor of X, Z is also a factor of X; can we derive anyhting out of it as to what can be the nfactors with respect to X, Y and Z ? Appreciate your response.
Say if X is a multiple of Y; and if in an toher statment says, X is a multiple of Z; Now when we combine both the statemetns, can we assume that X MUST be a multiple of of the LCM of Y and Z; assuming X, Y and Z are integers. I think at one point I made the mistake of thinking X will be a mutlitple of the product of YZ instead of the LCM. Just wanted to confirm this. Also, in the same reagrd, how do we treat factors. Say Y is a factor of X, Z is also a factor of X; can we derive anyhting out of it as to what can be the nfactors with respect to X, Y and Z ? Appreciate your response.
Ian Stewart wrote:If the original answer is A, you haven't typed out the question correctly. You've typed:raunekk wrote:sorry dude..OA= A
And i got d answer by plugging numbers..
any alternative tips or method..
anyone??
1) b is a multiple of 3
We know b is the product of three consecutive integers from the question, and therefore know that b must be divisible by 3! = 6 (that's a very useful fact to understand: the product of n consecutive integers is always divisible by n!). As written, statement 1) gives us no new information. If the OA to the question is A, then statement 1) surely is supposed to read:
1) b is a multiple of 8
Then, since we know b is divisible by 8 and by 3, b must be divisible by LCM of 8 and 3, or 24. So with this adjustment, statement 1 is sufficient.
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
What you said above is entirely correct- if X is divisible by Y and by Z, that means exactly the same thing as 'X is divisible by the LCM of Y and Z'. Those who think that X will be divisible by the product YZ will fall into one of the most common traps in GMAT number theory questions. If you understand this, you're going to do well on many GMAT divisibility questions.ildude02 wrote:Ian, I have a question with reagrds to multiples in this same regard,
Say if X is a multiple of Y; and if in an toher statment says, X is a multiple of Z; Now when we combine both the statemetns, can we assume that X MUST be a multiple of of the LCM of Y and Z; assuming X, Y and Z are integers. I think at one point I made the mistake of thinking X will be a mutlitple of the product of YZ instead of the LCM.
I think I'd need to see the type of question you're thinking of here to give a more concrete answer. Without any more information about the relationship between Y and Z, you can't say much. You might have, for example, Y = 3, Z = 4, X = 12, or you might have Y = 12, Z = 12 and X=12. That is, the GCD of X, Y and Z could be 1, or it could be X, depending on the situation. Normally you'd have more information, so in some circumstances, you would be able to say something more than that.ildude02 wrote: Just wanted to confirm this. Also, in the same reagrd, how do we treat factors. Say Y is a factor of X, Z is also a factor of X; can we derive anyhting out of it as to what can be the nfactors with respect to X, Y and Z ? Appreciate your response.
One fact that can be useful (though it's typically only useful at the most difficult level of the GMAT), perhaps in the kind of question you're thinking about, is that the lcm(x,y)*gcd(x,y) = x*y. That is, the product of two numbers equals the product of the LCM and the GCD. If you haven't seen this before, try it with, say, 12 and 9:
GCD of 12 and 9 = 3
LCM of 12 and 9 = 36
product of 12 and 9 = 108 = 3*36 = GCD*LCM
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
i'm a little late to this particular party, but i wanted to point out that the following weak-looking condition:
(1) c is even
would actually be SUFFICIENT in this problem.
here's why:
we need the number to be divisible by 24, which means the product of c, c+1, and c+2 must contain three 2's and a 3.
as other posters have mentioned above, the 3 is automatic in any string of three consecutive integers, because every third integer is a multiple of 3.
here's what's sweet, though: you're guaranteed to have three 2's. this is because you have two even numbers (c and c+2), and every other even number is a multiple of 4, containing at least two 2's by itself.
specifically, if c only contains one 2, then c+2 will contain at least two 2's, and vice versa.
therefore, b contains at least one 3 and three 2's.
sufficient.
(1) c is even
would actually be SUFFICIENT in this problem.
here's why:
we need the number to be divisible by 24, which means the product of c, c+1, and c+2 must contain three 2's and a 3.
as other posters have mentioned above, the 3 is automatic in any string of three consecutive integers, because every third integer is a multiple of 3.
here's what's sweet, though: you're guaranteed to have three 2's. this is because you have two even numbers (c and c+2), and every other even number is a multiple of 4, containing at least two 2's by itself.
specifically, if c only contains one 2, then c+2 will contain at least two 2's, and vice versa.
therefore, b contains at least one 3 and three 2's.
sufficient.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
