BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

OG-12 CR Q-59 juvenile horseshoe

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:53 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:4 members

OG-12 CR Q-59 juvenile horseshoe

by ankit0411 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:43 am
. In order to withstand tidal currents, juvenile horseshoe crabs frequently burrow in the sand. Such burrowing
discourages barnacles from clinging to their shells. When fully grown, however, the crabs can readily withstand
tidal currents without burrowing, and thus they acquire substantial populations of barnacles. Surprisingly, in
areas where tidal currents are very weak, juvenile horseshoe crabs are found not to have signi� cant barnacle
populations, even though they seldom burrow.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising � nding?
(A) Tidal currents do not themselves dislodge barnacles from the shells of horseshoe crabs.
(B) Barnacles most readily attach themselves to horseshoe crabs in areas where tidal currents are weakest.
(C) The strength of the tidal currents in a given location varies widely over the course of a day.
(D) A very large barnacle population can signi� cantly decrease the ability of a horseshoe crab to � nd food.
(E) Until they are fully grown, horseshoe crabs shed their shells and grow new ones several times a year.

I've not really understood as to why is E the right answer ? Can anyone help please :) ?

Thanks,
Ankit
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:50 am
Thanked: 214 times
Followed by:19 members
GMAT Score:740

by Birottam Dutta » Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:44 pm
In order to withstand tidal currents, juvenile horseshoe crabs frequently burrow in the sand. Such burrowing
discourages barnacles from clinging to their shells. When fully grown, however, the crabs can readily withstand
tidal currents without burrowing, and thus they acquire substantial populations of barnacles. Surprisingly, in
areas where tidal currents are very weak, juvenile horseshoe crabs are found not to have signi� cant barnacle
populations, even though they seldom burrow.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surprising � nding?
(A) Tidal currents do not themselves dislodge barnacles from the shells of horseshoe crabs.
(B) Barnacles most readily attach themselves to horseshoe crabs in areas where tidal currents are weakest.
(C) The strength of the tidal currents in a given location varies widely over the course of a day.
(D) A very large barnacle population can signi� cantly decrease the ability of a horseshoe crab to � nd food.
(E) Until they are fully grown, horseshoe crabs shed their shells and grow new ones several times a year.

A says that tidal currents do not by themselves dislodge the barnacles. But this is stated in the argument also. Refer the line "Such burrowing discourages barnacles from clinging to their shells" which implies that the burrowing dislodge the barnacles.

B goes against the argument and does nothing to help explain the surprise finding.

C is not being discussed here and daily variations in tidal strength is not the concern.

D may explain the argument but it is incorrect because the passage states that " When fully grown, however, the crabs can readily withstand tidal currents without burrowing, and thus they acquire substantial populations of barnacles". If D was correct then even full grown crabs would not have collected the barnacles.

E correctly explain the anomaly because if the young crabs shed their shells and grow new ones several times a year, then it shows that the low population of barnacles has little to do with the tidal strengths and explains why barnacles are not present in significant amounts in both high tide and low tide areas.

Hope this clears your doubt!
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:53 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:4 members

by ankit0411 » Sat Apr 21, 2012 7:52 am
Birottam Dutta wrote: D may explain the argument but it is incorrect because the passage states that " When fully grown, however, the crabs can readily withstand tidal currents without burrowing, and thus they acquire substantial populations of barnacles". If D was correct then even full grown crabs would not have collected the barnacles.

Hope this clears your doubt!
I'm still not clear with this option. D option even states the ability of a horseshoe to find food ?
This is nowhere mentioned in the passage and therefore would be incorrect isn't it ?
Top
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:38 am

by keekeemissy » Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:01 am
Some corrections to the info posted which doesn't really answer your question. Horseshoe Crabs, after the first couple years of life,only molt once a year on average. Also, they secrete a mucous substance that coats the outer carapace. This substance is thought to prevent non-mobile organisms from setting up housekeeping on the horseshoe crabs. As the crabs age, they make less and less of the mucous, and therefore have more animals living on them.
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1