BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Ratios - Work Problem

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Anju@Gurome » Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:50 am
The question doesn't make any sense.
It think it should be as follows...
candela.tartiere wrote:If it takes 12 workers working independently 3 hours to make 500 boxes, how many minutes should it take for 16 workers to make 300 boxes?
For 500 boxes, we need 12*3 = 36 worker-hours
For 300 boxes, we'll need (36/500)*300 = 3*36/5 worker=hours = (16 workers)*(3*36/5*16 hours)

3*36/5*16 hours = 3*36*60/5*16 minutes = 3*9*3 minutes = 81 minutes

The correct answer is C.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome

Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.

§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:27 am
candela.tartiere wrote:If it takes 12 workers 3 hours to make 500 boxes, how many minutes will it take 16 workers to make 300 boxes?

A) 60
B) 72
C) 81
D) 98
E) 240
Use the following proportion:
(workers)(time) / work = (workers)(time) / work

(12)(3) / 500 = (16)(x) / 300

36/500 = (16x)/300

8000x = 10800

80x = 108

x = 108/80 = 27/20 hours.

Since each hour is composed of 60 minutes, the number of minutes = (27/20)(60) = 81 minutes.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion