Astronomers have

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

Astronomers have

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:33 am
Princeton - CAT

Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.


A. persisting

B. persists

C. persisted

D. they persist

E. are persisting
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:42 am
Hi,
IMO A . OA plz?
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:00 am
Hi,
It is all about parallelism between past participle and present participle. We need a present participle to modify 'atoms and molecules'. So it should be molecules created... and persisting.... as particles still exist.

Hence, A
Last edited by Frankenstein on Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:19 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:7 members

by Ozlemg » Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:48 pm
IMO C

Parallism should be btw created and persisted.
The more you suffer before the test, the less you will do so in the test! :)

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 10:40 am
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:680

by anspeed » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:27 pm
IMO A

Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

by sameerballani » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:23 pm
Tough choice between A and C.

I will go with A

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:51 am
Location: Hyderabad, India
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:5 members

by galaxian » Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:29 pm
I would go for OA as A.

However, I think it is more of the action continuing in the present after the past event has happened than Parallelism for the explanation.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Fri Jun 03, 2011 5:01 pm
How to eliminate one of A and c??
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

by smackmartine » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:27 pm
IMO A

Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

We have to use parallel participles.

@cans, we cannot use "persisted" because particles still exist in the emptiest regions. There is no point in changing the verb tense in this case.
Last edited by smackmartine on Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:39 pm
smackmartine wrote:IMO A

Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

We have to use parallel verbs.

@cans, we cannot use "persisted" because particles still exist in the emptiest regions. There is no point in changing the verb tense in this case.
Hi, one quick question:

You are setting a parallelism between VERBS, but "persisting" is not a VERB, an -ing form without any helping verb cannot be a verb. I am aware of such parallelism but in that case we set parallelism b/w adjectives for ex, this case:

Football team, tired from 4 hours of play and wanting to reach home quickly, took the shortcut.

In the given question, COMPROMISE is a pure verb not a participle so how can u make a verb parallel to a present participle "persisting"????

Moreover, subject of the "persisting" should be atoms and molecules not participles...why check my next post. If u don't agree please post.
Last edited by atulmangal on Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 03, 2011 6:48 pm
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
It is all about parallelism between verb forms. We need a present participle to modify 'atoms and molecules'. So it should be molecules created... and persisting.... as particles still exist.

Hence, A
Hi, OA is A but i have some confusion please clear.

First i was confused with the structure, how do we read the sentence, 2 ways i show u, but i finally dropped one out of them...

Original:

Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

Way 1:

Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and [that] persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

Here, by inducing THAT / THAT parallelism, here the subject of the present participle "persisting" is particles not atoms and molecules.

But i drop this since in that case part after AND doesn't contain any verb and thats wrong as a relative clause must contain a verb...right.

2 way:

As it is:

Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and [atoms and molecules] persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

This i believe is correct. Now, u said we are setting up a parallelism b/w VERBS but i think we are setting up a parallelism b/w participle (adjectives) Not verbs...what do u think on this???

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:41 pm
atulmangal wrote:
Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and [atoms and molecules] persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

This i believe is correct. Now, u said we are setting up a parallelism b/w VERBS but i think we are setting up a parallelism b/w participle (adjectives) Not verbs...what do u think on this???
Hi,
My wording was wrong there. I meant parallelism between participles only as my reasoning also states the same. I will edit that part of my post.

Off topic: What about the other thread of'Laws of Physics'. I expect something from you on that thread if you are not convinced.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:00 pm
Frankenstein wrote:
atulmangal wrote:
Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and [atoms and molecules] persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

This i believe is correct. Now, u said we are setting up a parallelism b/w VERBS but i think we are setting up a parallelism b/w participle (adjectives) Not verbs...what do u think on this???
Hi,
My wording was wrong there. I meant parallelism between participles only as my reasoning also states the same. I will edit that part of my post.

Off topic: What about the other thread of'Laws of Physics'. I expect something from you on that thread if you are not convinced.
Off topic: What about the other thread of'Laws of Physics'. I expect something from you on that thread if you are not convinced.
Hi i was thinking u gonna ask me about that...actually yesterday i typed my response, a long one...and then suddenly before posting my browser crashed...there are still some issues, finally i thought unless the source is not official i should leave that question, because my exam date is closing in so didn't find enough time to retype otherwise m not this kind off person who left the things unclear. Sorry brother, i hope u can understand my situation there, still if i find some free time, i will re-post my reply....sorry again..but i really appreciate u responded to that post.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:09 pm
atulmangal wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:
atulmangal wrote:
Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and [atoms and molecules] persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

This i believe is correct. Now, u said we are setting up a parallelism b/w VERBS but i think we are setting up a parallelism b/w participle (adjectives) Not verbs...what do u think on this???
Hi,
My wording was wrong there. I meant parallelism between participles only as my reasoning also states the same. I will edit that part of my post.

Off topic: What about the other thread of'Laws of Physics'. I expect something from you on that thread if you are not convinced.
Off topic: What about the other thread of'Laws of Physics'. I expect something from you on that thread if you are not convinced.
Hi i was thinking u gonna ask me about that...actually yesterday i typed my response, a long one...and then suddenly before posting my browser crashed...there are still some issues, finally i thought unless the source is not official i should leave that question, because my exam date is closing in so didn't find enough time to retype otherwise m not this kind off person who left the things unclear. Sorry brother, i hope u can understand my situation there, still if i find some free time, i will re-post my reply....sorry again..but i really appreciate u respond to that post.
Hey,
Take it easy. Thanks to your browser, I do not need to look at that question for some time. Even I didn't feel that was a well-framed question(I could be wrong though). That's the reason I have mentioned that I would respond to only your quotes and not the OA. Anyway, you are good @SC. So, with the time constraints, I suggest you not to waste your time posting long ones on SC(that too for questions from unknown sources) and instead to concentrate on other areas. Good luck!
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

by smackmartine » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:11 pm
atulmangal wrote:
smackmartine wrote:IMO A

Astronomers have theorized that the Big Bang governs the behavior of interstellar dust, particles that comprise the atoms and molecules created in the progenitive explosion and persisting in even the emptiest regions of space.

We have to use parallel verbs.

@cans, we cannot use "persisted" because particles still exist in the emptiest regions. There is no point in changing the verb tense in this case.
Hi, one quick question:

You are setting a parallelism between VERBS, but "persisting" is not a VERB, an -ing form without any helping verb cannot be a verb. I am aware of such parallelism but in that case we set parallelism b/w adjectives for ex, this case:

Football team, tired from 4 hours of play and wanting to reach home quickly, took the shortcut.

In the given question, COMPROMISE is a pure verb not a participle so how can u make a verb parallel to a present participle "persisting"????

Moreover, subject of the "persisting" should be atoms and molecules not participles...why check my next post. If u don't agree please post.
Sorry bro , I must have have been in some different world while typing this because I highlighted the words first (wrongly) and then started explaining after a Tea break!!! . Definitely, parallel participles are required.