BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Strengthen Question

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:08 pm
Followed by:2 members

Strengthen Question

by kamalakarthi » Fri Aug 04, 2017 12:01 pm
Hi, This question is from Veritas Prep question bank.

In this question, can you help me understand why option E is not correct. My line of analysis.

Conclusion ::There must be something qualitatively different b/w 2 types of mem loss.

Strengthen ::Something should say that fundamentally something is different.

I thought since age is different, the results are different. What am I missing in bigger picture ? Can you please help.


Image
Top
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
Location: Boston, MA
Thanked: 1153 times
Followed by:128 members
GMAT Score:770

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Fri Aug 04, 2017 12:51 pm
kamalakarthi wrote:Hi, This question is from Veritas Prep question bank.

In this question, can you help me understand why option E is not correct. My line of analysis.

Conclusion ::There must be something qualitatively different b/w 2 types of mem loss.

Strengthen ::Something should say that fundamentally something is different.

I thought since age is different, the results are different. What am I missing in bigger picture ? Can you please help.


Image
The problem is that we want to know whether there's a difference in the type of brain impairment. Knowing that there's a difference in age between the two groups doesn't tell us this. (And the age gap is something we likely could have surmised on our own. People who are diagnosed with Alzheimer's tend to be older than people who suffer brain injuries from car crashes or high-impact sports.)

Think of it this way: the study is suggesting that the two groups are fundamentally different. If we want to strengthen the conclusion we're deriving from the study, we want it to be the case that the study was well-conducted. In other words, we don't want to have to worry about confounding variables. If for example, Person A suffers from early-stage Alzheimer's and has mild memory impairment and Person B was just in a devastating car wreck and suffered a severe traumatic brain injury, the fact that the drug worked for Person A and not for Person B wouldn't tell us whether the drug works better for Alzheimer's than it does for acute injuries. It would simply confirm that Person A came in with a less severe condition that was more amenable to treatment. So that's the big issue: was the drug tested on subjects who had similar memory impairment.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Top
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1