BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

hard question

Expert replies

by fibbonnaci » Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:30 pm
hey i feel there is something inherently wrong with this question. Let us suppose that p includes 3, we still do not have information whether the set of integers in p are distinct and unique.If they are then 3+ 3 can not result.

The set of P could be this too: [1,2,3,4,5]. this satisfies the statement 1 but does not contain the multiples of 3.

According to me the answer is E.

Also if A is true then Conversely even statement 2 should be true. coz if the set consists of multiples of 3 then any (multiple of 3) - 3 must result in another multiple of 3. so the answer should then be D and not A.


I would like to know the source of this question!
Join the discussion

by rockeyb » Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:48 pm
I am not sure if this is a good GMAT question as I see a lot of people having different views and after reading fibonaci's post I am confused .

So here is the original question and official explanation.
If P is a set of integers and 3 is in P, is every positive multiple of 3 in P?

(1) For any integer in P, the sum of 3 and that integer is also in P

(2) for any integer in P, that integer minus 3 is also in P.

The correct answer is A:

To find the answer to this yes-or-no question, try Plugging In to the two statements, starting with the one number that you know is in the set 3. Statement (1) gives us all the positive multiples of 3, which answers the question with a definitive "yes". stetement (2) gives us all the negative multiples of 3, plus 0. The correct answer is A.

Source : Princeton cracking 2009
"Know thyself" and "Nothing in excess"
Join the discussion

by vcb » Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:37 pm
Hmm..Fibo, you have considered the set p to be [1,2,3,4,5]. If you look at stmt 1, it says 'For any int in P, sum of 3 and that int is also in P".

Let us take the set you have considered - if 1 is present, 1 + 3 should also be present in P. 4 is. Now since 4 is present in P, 4 + 3 should also be present. 7 should be.

Smilarly, if we now consider 3 (since we definitely know from the question stem that it's present in P) 3+3 should be present => 6 should be there. Since 6 is there, 6+3 should be present in P and so on. The set P, then, becomes an infinite series, stretching all the way RIGHT of '0' on the number line, i. e. the positive realm.

Now, lets consider stmt 2:
Since 3 is present, 3-3= 0 should be present, 0-3=-3 should be present, and on it goes till the -ve infinity, but never coming to the positive side of 0.
Of course, it is possible that the series does not start from 3, but from an infinite positive number, for our convenience, lets say 999. Then 999-3=996 should be present, and so on, all the way to negative infinity. But from the Question stem or the stmt 2, we cannot be sure if that a infinite +ve multiple of 3 is present in P or not. So not sufficient.

Makes any sense?
Join the discussion

by fibbonnaci » Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:51 pm
yupp i knew its an indefinite series, but just to put forth my point i laid that set.
Thanks for clarifying. i mis read the question.
Join the discussion

by outreach » Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:19 pm
positive multiple of 3 include...3,6,9,12,15,......and so on '0' is not a positive multiple of 3
stmt 1

if one no is 3 then other can be 3+3=6,the next is 6+3=9,..and so on.
P=[3, 6, 9, ...]. all these no r +ve multiple of 3
sufficient

stmt 2
if one no is 3 then other can be 3-3=0,then next is 0-3=-3,then next is -3-3=-6....
P=[3, 0, -3,-6 ....]. all these r not +ve multiple of 3
not sufficient


hence A
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by srinivasarajui » Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:17 am
Question Once again
IF P is a set of integer , is every multiple of 3 in P.

(1) For any integer in P, the sum of 3 and that integer is also in P

( 2) For any integer in , that integer minus 3 is also in P

This is a Yes/No DS question.

From statement(1)
Case 1: Let 6 be an element in set P, then 6+3 is in set P, So result is Yes
Case 2: Let 5 be an element in set P, then 5+3 is in set P, So result is NO

From statement(2)
Case 1: Let 6 be an element in set P, then 6-3 is in set P, So result is Yes
Case 2: Let 5 be an element in set P, then 5-3 is in set P, So result is NO

From statement(1) and statement(2)
Case 1: Let 6 be an element in set P, then 6+3 and 6-3 is in set P, So result is Yes
Case 2: Let 5 be an element in set P, then 5+3 and 5-3 is in set P, So result is NO

Unless we are able to find one element of the set we cant come to a concision.
So the answer choice E is correct.
[/quote]
Srinu
Join the discussion