BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

What is meant by direct object ?

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

What is meant by direct object ?

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:21 am
Hi All,

Can someone please tell what is meant by direct object....there are couple of explanations in OG where they talk about direct object.....(but I don't remember the Question number as of now)....

I think OG say that for direct object we do not need "that"....

e.g. I think I will play today.

Can someone please tell why "that" is not required for direct object and what is the difference between direct and "not" direct objects ?

Thanks
Mohit
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:03 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by kyabe » Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:29 am
Direct object is something which takes the action performed by the subject.

For example:

I kicked the ball.

Here ball is the direct object.

Peter bought Susan a necklace.

Here Susan is indirect object and necklace is direct object.

The above statement can be written as:

Peter bought necklace for Susan.

Indirect object can be rephrased as to Indirect Object or for Indirect object.

Hope this helps!!!
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:39 am
kyabe wrote:Direct object is something which takes the action performed by the subject.

For example:

I kicked the ball.

Here ball is the direct object.

Peter bought Susan a necklace.

Here Susan is indirect object and necklace is direct object.

The above statement can be written as:

Peter bought necklace for Susan.

Indirect object can be rephrased as to Indirect Object or for Indirect object.

Hope this helps!!!
Oh ok thanks....

Can you please tell what difference for GMAT purpose this distinction of direct and indirect object create ?

Basically how does GMAT tests this....?

Can you please help ?
Last edited by goelmohit2002 on Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:03 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by kyabe » Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:41 am
Mohit,

To answer how GMAT tests these, I am not a right person. As this is not something we can categorize as parallelism or any topics under which we can categorize it. If you give me the question number I might help..
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:11 am
kyabe wrote:Mohit,

To answer how GMAT tests these, I am not a right person. As this is not something we can categorize as parallelism or any topics under which we can categorize it. If you give me the question number I might help..
Thanks kyabe.

Please see the below question#155 of OG-10. Here to kick out A, B, D......OG says that "A, B, and D
lack the conjunction "that" needed to introduce the direct object clause."

Can you please tell me about this rule....why "that" is necessarily required after direct object....or there is some specific conditions when "that" is required. Do we need "that" only or any other relative pronoun is also OK.

==============================================

Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent and are suspicious of strangers.
(A) the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(B) local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(C) that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and
(D) local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
(E) that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 3:03 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by kyabe » Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:15 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:

Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent and are suspicious of strangers.
(A) the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(B) local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(C) that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and
(D) local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
(E) that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
Here we dont need to go to that detail. Its very simple if u see a parallalism between the traits of local witnesses.


local witnesses are difficult to locate
are reticent
and are suspicious of strangers.

None of other options makes the traits of local witnesses parallel..Does that makes sense..
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:20 am
kyabe wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:

Federal authorities involved in the investigation have found the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent and are suspicious of strangers.
(A) the local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(B) local witnesses to be difficult to locate, reticent, and are
(C) that local witnesses are difficult to locate, reticent, and
(D) local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
(E) that local witnesses are difficult to locate and reticent, and they are
Here we dont need to go to that detail. Its very simple if u see a parallalism between the traits of local witnesses.


local witnesses are difficult to locate
are reticent
and are suspicious of strangers.

None of other options makes the traits of local witnesses parallel..Does that makes sense..
Hi Kyabe,

Thanks.

But...actually i also got the answer with the above approach that you suggested......but IMO we should learn the other important concept (of direct object) that OG want to test...they will test in some other question where may be only this concept might be tested.....

Can you please help understand this concept ?
Top

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:36 pm
Received a PM asking me to respond.

First, an object in general is, if it is present in a sentence, typically part of what's called the predicate, or the part after the main verb. If an object is present, it is part of the core of the sentence.

She likes cats.

She = subj, likes = verb, cats = object

A sentence doesn't have to have an object.

She runs.

A sentence can have a direct object.

In "she likes cats," the word "cats" is a direct object. A direct object answers the question "What?" or "Whom?"

What does she like? cats.

A sentence can also have an indirect object.

She gave him a cat.

"Cat" is still the direct object (gave what? a cat). "him" is the indirect object. It answers the question "To or for whom?" or "To or for what?" In this case, it answers the question "for whom? him."

The GMAT doesn't test this much - it's not a major isse on this test.
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1