BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GMAT PREP- Too Many K's

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times
Followed by:3 members

Re: GMAT PREP- Too Many K's

by sudhir3127 » Sun Aug 24, 2008 10:41 pm
smclean23 wrote:If k does not equal 0, 1, or -1, is 1/k >0?

1. 1/k-1>0
2. 1/k+1>0






Answer is A.
i go with A as well..
In Such DS question u just have to tell the answer in YES or NO

statement 1. 1/k-1>0
it can be rewritten as

1/k>1 thus we can it will surely be greater than o...sufficient

statement 2. 1/k+1>0

1/k>-1 but this tells us nothing abt whether its >0.. hence insufficient

thus A.

Hope that helps...
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by smclean23 » Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:24 pm
I still have no idea how you got this answer. Can you please rephrase or can anyone else out there help?

THANKS!
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:24 am
Location: LA
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:740

by jeffxujian » Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:54 pm
I am providing you with an explanation about condition 2, which is 1/k+1>0. If we deduct 1 on both side, we will have 1/k>-1, if 1/k =2, 1/K is greater than 0. However, you may have overlooked the numerical values between -1 and 0. What if 1/K = -1/4, will you still conclude that 1/K >0? Hope my explanation makes sense.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:26 am
Location: Accra, Ghana
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:720

1/k

by bbaah » Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:06 am
Since we are interested in finding out if 1/k>0, we only need to isolate 1/k on one side of the inequalities in (1) and (2).

(1) 1/k - 1 > 0

=> 1/k > 1 (adding 1 to both sides of the inequality)

anything greater than 1 will also be greater than 0.

Sufficient.

(2) 1/k + 1 > 0

=> 1/k > -1 (subtracting 1 from both sides of the inequality)

If something is greater than -1, it could be -1/2, 0 , 1, 2, ...

So we cannot tell for sure if 1/k is greater than 0 (1/k = -1/2 <0, and 1/k = 1 >0)

Not Sufficient.


Statement 1 alone is Sufficient. A
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:00 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by smclean23 » Mon Sep 29, 2008 9:34 am
Thanks guys!

I didnt know that with an inequality you can just subtract or add a value, ie. subtracting or adding 1 from 1/k+1 or 1/k-1.
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:06 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by rajataga » Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:15 am
Wrongggggggg.......

everybody has read the question only wrong.....this is the problem with typing it out on a pc.....

Image

I had this same problem....I searched it and found this thread

I KNOW HOW (A) ALONE SATISFIES THE PROBLEM.....HOWEVER, I FEEL THAT (B) ALONE WILL ALSO SATISFY THE PROBLEM....

FOR ALL VALUES OF K, WHICH ARE NEGATIVE (except -1), 1/(k+1) will be negative hence, <0, which does not satisfy the condition.....


Hence, we know that k should be Positive......

Hence, we can conclusively say that 1/k>0 by using B alone also....

so shudn the answer be "D"

Waiting for the experts to comment on this one....
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:23 am
Wrongggggggg.......

everybody has read the question only wrong.....this is the problem with typing it out on a pc.....


Given : k is not 1,0 or -1. It can be any other integer or fraction

Stmt II
1/k+1 > 0

k= - 1/2

1/k+1 > 0 but 1/k < 0 YES

K=5 1/K+1 > 0 and 1/k < 0 NO

Hence INSUFF

For stm I to be true k has to be positive( >1) so 1/k > 0

Hence A)
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 11:06 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by rajataga » Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:32 am
yeahh....thanks dude


i didn consider the values between 0 and -1.......when i read "not equal to 0, -1" i assumed k to be lesser than -1, which would give 1/(k+1) as always less than 0.....


stupid mistake on my part
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Thu Dec 25, 2008 12:38 am
stupid mistake on my part
Trust me most of us do! Its good to get it clarified as hopefully the next time we wont...

Good luck!
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 145
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 1:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

by mental » Thu Dec 25, 2008 10:32 pm
Question is 1/K > 0
now this value can be greater than 0, when and only when k>0
so if k is positive, 1/k will also be positive

St1: 1/(k -1)>0
as the whole expression is positive, and numerator (1) is positive, the denominator (k-1) will also be positive
Therefore, (k-1) > 0
k>1 SUFFICIENT


St1: 1/(k + 1)>0
as the whole expression is positive, and numerator (1) is positive, the denominator (1+k) will also be positive
(k+1)>0
k>-1
k can be both positive and negetive. INSUFFICIENT

Ans A
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Thanked: 33 times
Followed by:4 members

by vittalgmat » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:22 pm
mental ,
Ur answer is very elegant.
Thank you.
Top
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:02 am
Location: United States

by clsimmon » Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:06 am
I am still confused on this one. Why would (1) be sufficient? What if K=-2, the answer would be No. but if it equaled 2, then the answer would be yes
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:32 am
Location: Delhi
Thanked: 84 times
Followed by:9 members

by sureshbala » Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:17 am
clsimmon wrote:I am still confused on this one. Why would (1) be sufficient? What if K=-2, the answer would be No. but if it equaled 2, then the answer would be yes
Dear friend, statement I says 1/(k-1) >0
From this we can conclude that (k-1)>0
So k>1.

Hence I is sufficient

II says 1/(k+1)>0
So k+1>0
Hence k>-1
From this we can't conclude whether 1/k is greater than 0 or not.

So A must be the answer
Top
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 2:04 pm

by alexdallas » Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:18 pm
What i think is most imporant in this question is the fact that K is not stated to be an integer. Thus, if k>-1, k can be negative as well.

This is what always seems to get me in these kind of problems, i assume all variables are integers, even if its not stated so :\
Top
Post new topic Post Reply