I was using the "beat the Gmat practice" problem question bank and came across this problem:
It took Ellen 6 hours to ride her bike a total distance of 120 miles. For the first part of the trip, her speed was constantly 25 miles per hour. For the second part of her trip, her speed was constantly 15 miles per hour. For how many miles did Ellen travel at 25 miles per hour?
a. 60
b. 62
c. 66 2/3
d. 75
e. 90
OA:D
My question is not how the correct answer was calculated, but if my alternate method is valid or dumb luck? The test bank official explanation demonstrated the algebraic approach. Where D was used for the unknown distance traveled at 25 mph and d-120 was used for distance traveled at 15 mph. These values were plugged into D/R = T equation.
Since i was timing myself i did not want to spend too much time on this problem using algebra. Instead I calculated the average speed of the rider (total distance/ total time ;120mi / 6 h = 20 mph). Then i used the average balancing technique to calculate how many hours were required for 15 mph to balance 25 mph. After drawing the average balancing figure, I noticed that 25 mph was +5 above the average and 15 mph was -5 below the average. I knew that the time traveled at the different speeds had to be equal and deduced 3 hrs was spent at both since the total hours had to add to 6. Then I quickly multiplied 25mph * 3hrs = 75. I have not worked out my approach algebraically yet, but i will later on. Was my approach valid? It seems like alot of work when i write it out, but i only spent 1:45 mins on the problem and was able to do most of the work in my head. I wrote down a few notes and drew the average balance figure. What does everyone think?
It took Ellen 6 hours to ride her bike a total distance of 120 miles. For the first part of the trip, her speed was constantly 25 miles per hour. For the second part of her trip, her speed was constantly 15 miles per hour. For how many miles did Ellen travel at 25 miles per hour?
a. 60
b. 62
c. 66 2/3
d. 75
e. 90
OA:D
My question is not how the correct answer was calculated, but if my alternate method is valid or dumb luck? The test bank official explanation demonstrated the algebraic approach. Where D was used for the unknown distance traveled at 25 mph and d-120 was used for distance traveled at 15 mph. These values were plugged into D/R = T equation.
Since i was timing myself i did not want to spend too much time on this problem using algebra. Instead I calculated the average speed of the rider (total distance/ total time ;120mi / 6 h = 20 mph). Then i used the average balancing technique to calculate how many hours were required for 15 mph to balance 25 mph. After drawing the average balancing figure, I noticed that 25 mph was +5 above the average and 15 mph was -5 below the average. I knew that the time traveled at the different speeds had to be equal and deduced 3 hrs was spent at both since the total hours had to add to 6. Then I quickly multiplied 25mph * 3hrs = 75. I have not worked out my approach algebraically yet, but i will later on. Was my approach valid? It seems like alot of work when i write it out, but i only spent 1:45 mins on the problem and was able to do most of the work in my head. I wrote down a few notes and drew the average balance figure. What does everyone think?












