The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.
A. a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a
B. a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a
C. a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well
D. critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of
E. critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own
The OA for this question as usual to my surprise is B
Any explantions for the above ???
Results of early experiment
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:44 am
- Thanked: 5 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
I doubt the OA.
Reason : his in option B is ambiguous .
I would hav chose A.
Please correct me if i am wrong
Reason : his in option B is ambiguous .
I would hav chose A.
Please correct me if i am wrong
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:21 am
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:44 am
- Thanked: 5 times
True,Vignesh.4384 wrote:I doubt the OA.
Reason : his in option B is ambiguous .
I would hav chose A.
Please correct me if i am wrong
IMO A,
In B also critique and envisioning are not parallel
But the OA says B !
Gearing up for the D-day.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
I would go with D
D modify for the sentence preceding
D modify for the sentence preceding
Please share your idea and your reasoning
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:1 members
Hi annakool1009,
are you sure about the OA?
any one can explain this?
are you sure about the OA?
any one can explain this?
Please share your idea and your reasoning
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
I have a different take to this
what should be the best bet after " all chemistry".
all chemistry since Robert Boyle ... seems bad enough
all chemistry following Robert Boyle ... if we think of following as affililiation to Boyle rather than as after him
As far as his envisioing, the gerund does make up a noun to parallel Critique
what should be the best bet after " all chemistry".
all chemistry since Robert Boyle ... seems bad enough
all chemistry following Robert Boyle ... if we think of following as affililiation to Boyle rather than as after him
As far as his envisioing, the gerund does make up a noun to parallel Critique
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:21 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Guys OA is correct
Difference between A & B.... Job is to modify Eassay.....,
From A it says Eassay, A as well as B that is new chemistry right ???
so it shows only B is new chemistry
Now
From B it says A and also B that means both are new chemistry
The real problem would have been it only A and B was given as option
Difference between A & B.... Job is to modify Eassay.....,
From A it says Eassay, A as well as B that is new chemistry right ???
so it shows only B is new chemistry
Now
From B it says A and also B that means both are new chemistry
The real problem would have been it only A and B was given as option