BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

gprep sc- 31

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
Location: NY
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:11 members

gprep sc- 31

by abhasjha » Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:50 am
The proliferation of so-called cyber squatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cyber squatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seed up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

A. passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

B. the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell

C. the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

D. the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

E. the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:13 am

by sukkhi » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:51 am
bet on (c)
(a)- agent of allowing -The proliferation -big no
(b)- which refers to 1999
(d)- the proliferation didnt led to the act, it led to its passage
(e)- same problem as (d) also not parallel
Top
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Aug 26, 2014 5:04 am
The last word of the underlined portion should be selling:
The proliferation of so-called cyber squatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seed up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

A. passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling.

B. the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell

C. the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

D. the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

E. the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
The agent of a COMMA + VERBing modifier must be the SUBJECT of the preceding clause.
In A, allowing seems to refer to the proliferation -- the subject of the preceding clause -- implying that the PROLIFERATION OF CYBER-SQUATTERS was ALLOWING companies to seek damages.
The intended meaning is that THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT allows companies to seek damages.
Eliminate A.

COMMA + which + SINGULAR VERB must refer to the nearest preceding singular noun.
In B, which seems to refer to 1999, implying that 1999 allows companies to seek damages.
Not the intended meaning.
Eliminate B.

In D, which and it both serve to refer to the Consumer Protection Act.
Two different pronouns cannot have the same referent
Eliminate D.

A VERBing modifier must serve to express an action that is CONTEMPORANEOUS with the main verb.
In E, allowing implies that -- when the proliferation LED TO PASSAGE of the Act -- the Act was already ALLOWING companies to seek damages.
Implication:
Before the act was fully passed, it was already allowing companies to seek damages.
Not a logical sequence.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1