Good CR lsat

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

Good CR lsat

by bblast » Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:59 pm
3. Carolyn: The artist Marc Quinn has displayed, behind a
glass plate, biologically replicated fragments of
Sir John Sulston's DNA, calling it a "conceptual
portrait" of Sulston. But to be a portrait, something
must bear a recognizable resemblance to its
subject.
Arnold: I disagree. Quinn's conceptual portrait is a
maximally realistic portrait, for it holds actual
instructions according to which Sulston was
created.

The dialogue provides most support for the claim that
Carolyn and Arnold disagree over whether the object
described by Quinn as a conceptual portrait of Sir John
Sulston
(A) should be considered to be art
(B) should be considered to be Quinn's work
(C) bears a recognizable resemblance to Sulston
(D) contains instructions according to which Sulston
was created
(E) is actually a portrait of Sulston

OA in some time.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 905
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:38 am
Thanked: 378 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:760

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Tue Jan 04, 2011 12:19 am
Cool question, but not that difficult.

First figure out what the question is asking: phrase it in your own words. If you cut away all the BS, you end up with "what do Carolyn and Arnold actually disagree about?"

What indeed? Carolyn presents the object and says that the artist calls it a portrait. She then goes to show voice her concern: to be a portrait, it must bear recognizable resemblance. This objection sums up Carolyn's position: Since the DNA apparently bears no recognizable resemblance to Sulton, it is not a portrait.

Arnold disagrees by saying that the conceptual portrait is a portrait - and that is the point of disagreement between the two: Whether this DNA is a portrait or not. The answer is E.

The only dangerous answer choice that I see is C, but whether the DNA resembles Sulton or not is not contested by Arnold. Arnold isn't saying "you're wrong - this fragment of DNA DOES resemble Sulton". What Arnold is saying that the DNA can be used to recreate Sulton, but not that it resembles him in its sorry, present state.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 am
Thanked: 118 times
Followed by:33 members
GMAT Score:710

by bblast » Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:09 am
Thanks Geva, the answer is in fact E, I guessed C would trick a few people , so thought of posting the question.

This is a lower level LSAT prob.
Cheers !!

Quant 47-Striving for 50
Verbal 34-Striving for 40

My gmat journey :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/710-bblast-s ... 90735.html
My take on the GMAT RC :
https://www.beatthegmat.com/ways-to-bbla ... 90808.html
How to prepare before your MBA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upz46D7 ... TWBZF14TKW_