BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

GOLD

Expert replies

by mmslf75 » Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:38 am
thanks ron !!
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:28 pm
mmslf75 wrote:thanks ron !!
glad it helped.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by mohish » Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:46 am
lunarpower wrote:expanding on what stuart said:
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Very quick question if you know what to look for:

"because of erosion..." needs to be followed with ".. that put gold...".

"since erosion..." needs to be followed with "put gold...".
yes.

i should add that we can also say "because erosion ... put gold ...", although that structure is not present in any of the choices.
I read a recommendation somewhere (forget where) that 'since' on GMAT is used only to depict time (example: Since 1980). So, in light of this sentence looks like that recommendation is not correct.

Can some expert please confirm.

Also, even after reading this sentence multiple times, I am not getting the 'meaning' of E. Would be wonderful if someone can explain it.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:21 pm
mohish wrote:I read a recommendation somewhere (forget where) that 'since' on GMAT is used only to depict time (example: Since 1980). So, in light of this sentence looks like that recommendation is not correct.

Can some expert please confirm.

Also, even after reading this sentence multiple times, I am not getting the 'meaning' of E. Would be wonderful if someone can explain it.
yep, it looks like this "recommendation" is wrong-o.
btw, it's always a good idea to retain the sources of advice -- the more sweeping or general the advice, the more important it is to retain the source -- so that you can then check those sources for their reliability and authenticity.

regarding the meaning of the sentence, try this:
* replace "since" with "because"
* replace "erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity" with "these 3 things"
then you get
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because these 3 things put gold literally within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel.
is that easier to understand?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by mohish » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:21 pm
Thanks Ron. That clears things up.
Join the discussion

by Resp007 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:58 pm
HI,
Is the following sentence correct?
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds.

Also, whether "prehistoric glacier movement" or "prehistoric glacier movements" correct in the sentence above?

Thanks in advance.
Resp007
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:19 am
Resp007 wrote:HI,
Is the following sentence correct?
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds.
It doesn't contain any grammatical errors, but it doesn't make sense. You've removed the actual REASON why "prospecting was an easy task", so now it's a non sequitur.

Analogy:
Everything in my suitcase is all wet because the heat caused a bottle of hair spray to explode.
... ok, that makes sense.

Everything in my suitcase is all wet because of the heat.
... Huh? Nonsense.

Same deal here.

Also, whether "prehistoric glacier movement" or "prehistoric glacier movements" correct in the sentence above?
The gmat wouldn't test this difference.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by guptas » Sat Nov 23, 2013 7:21 pm
How do you supposed to know every idiom?
Join the discussion