BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GOLD

Expert replies

by mmslf75 » Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:38 am
thanks ron !!
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:28 pm
mmslf75 wrote:thanks ron !!
glad it helped.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by mohish » Sat Dec 18, 2010 6:46 am
lunarpower wrote:expanding on what stuart said:
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Very quick question if you know what to look for:

"because of erosion..." needs to be followed with ".. that put gold...".

"since erosion..." needs to be followed with "put gold...".
yes.

i should add that we can also say "because erosion ... put gold ...", although that structure is not present in any of the choices.
I read a recommendation somewhere (forget where) that 'since' on GMAT is used only to depict time (example: Since 1980). So, in light of this sentence looks like that recommendation is not correct.

Can some expert please confirm.

Also, even after reading this sentence multiple times, I am not getting the 'meaning' of E. Would be wonderful if someone can explain it.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Dec 19, 2010 6:21 pm
mohish wrote:I read a recommendation somewhere (forget where) that 'since' on GMAT is used only to depict time (example: Since 1980). So, in light of this sentence looks like that recommendation is not correct.

Can some expert please confirm.

Also, even after reading this sentence multiple times, I am not getting the 'meaning' of E. Would be wonderful if someone can explain it.
yep, it looks like this "recommendation" is wrong-o.
btw, it's always a good idea to retain the sources of advice -- the more sweeping or general the advice, the more important it is to retain the source -- so that you can then check those sources for their reliability and authenticity.

regarding the meaning of the sentence, try this:
* replace "since" with "because"
* replace "erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds thrust to the surface by volcanic activity" with "these 3 things"
then you get
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because these 3 things put gold literally within reach of anybody with a pan or shovel.
is that easier to understand?
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by mohish » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:21 pm
Thanks Ron. That clears things up.
Join the discussion

by Resp007 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:58 pm
HI,
Is the following sentence correct?
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds.

Also, whether "prehistoric glacier movement" or "prehistoric glacier movements" correct in the sentence above?

Thanks in advance.
Resp007
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sat Nov 09, 2013 4:19 am
Resp007 wrote:HI,
Is the following sentence correct?
Prospecting for gold during the California gold rush was a relatively easy task, because of erosion, prehistoric glacier movement, and ancient, gold-bearing riverbeds.
It doesn't contain any grammatical errors, but it doesn't make sense. You've removed the actual REASON why "prospecting was an easy task", so now it's a non sequitur.

Analogy:
Everything in my suitcase is all wet because the heat caused a bottle of hair spray to explode.
... ok, that makes sense.

Everything in my suitcase is all wet because of the heat.
... Huh? Nonsense.

Same deal here.

Also, whether "prehistoric glacier movement" or "prehistoric glacier movements" correct in the sentence above?
The gmat wouldn't test this difference.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by guptas » Sat Nov 23, 2013 7:21 pm
How do you supposed to know every idiom?
Join the discussion