BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Three women ..

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:03 amFollowed by: 1 member
GMAT Score:640
by leaonae » Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:24 pm
The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, <u>have consistently received labor's unqualifying support<u>

1. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support
2. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor
3. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor
4. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor
5. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor.


Please explain the difference between 1 and 3.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:12 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:730

by chintanjadwani » Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:20 pm
I believe the use of passive voice in 1 makes it incorrect, as the option 3 is in active voice... :)

hope i'm right,,,,
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 12 times

by piyush_nitt » Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:55 pm
chintanjadwani wrote:I believe the use of passive voice in 1 makes it incorrect, as the option 3 is in active voice... :)

hope i'm right,,,,
Why 2 is wrong?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

Re: Three women ..

by nervesofsteel » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:17 pm
leaonae wrote:The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, <u>have consistently received labor's unqualifying support<u>

1. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support
2. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor
3. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor
4. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor
5. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor.


Please explain the difference between 1 and 3.
IMO 3

Consistently receiving shows that they were receiving support in past as well as present .. thus use of present prefect tense..

Whts the OA..??
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:24 pm
Why 2 is wrong?
In most situations dont change the tense of what's given unless the situation demands. For example when there are 2 past actions u use the past perfect for the 1st past action(action that happenned first out of 2 past actions) and simple past for the second etc to bring to light the sequence of events

The past perfect tense have + V3(past particple) indicates that an action started in the past and it may or may not yet be completed.

In 2) we are saying we know for sure that they are still receiving whatever they are receiving and we dont know for sure the writer wants us to believe this.

Between 1 and 3 "support of" sounds idiomatic.

Eg: I need the support of my classmates, to win the school election.

Hope this helps!

Regards,
CR
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 pm
Thanked: 3 times

Re: Three women ..

by thetrystero » Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:49 am
leaonae wrote:The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, <u>have consistently received labor's unqualifying support<u>

1. have consistently received labor's unqualifying support
2. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor
3. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor
4. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor
5. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor.


Please explain the difference between 1 and 3.
My Answer: 3

There is no way to know whether labor is still supporting them at the time of reading or will continue to support them in future. Thus ruling out present, present continuous, future etc. tenses (2,4,5)

The meaning that is trying to be expressed here is that labor completely and without reservations supports the three women. Hence, "unqualified support" is the right usage. "unqualifying" does not exist in the dictionary, and even if it did, it would probably mean something like "not kosher"/"not qualified" and so changes the meaning of the sentence. Rules out (1,2)

"labor" modifies "support", not "received" so use "of", not "by". Rules out (4,5).

Finally, "unqualified support of labor" sounds more elegant than "labor's unqualified support" (if that answer choice was offered), although both are correct.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 108
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 2:04 pm

by alexdallas » Sat Jul 18, 2009 2:41 pm
yepp...between 1 and 3 the main difference is "unqualifying" vs "unqualified".

tks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:35 am

by sbrara » Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:47 am
Also, labor's unqualifying support is awkward and implies that the support of labor is universal or always holds true.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:06 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 14 times

by frank1 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:07 am
i think A,B,C are equally good candidates to be answer
(i think any one can be defended if they say it is the answer as it only depends how are present it now....)
Gramatically A B C are correct
A and C are more correct as in many cases i have seen continous tense are not preferred in gmat( but having said that i dont think it is totally incorrect)

Between A and C almost says the same thing in this case and goes down to differece between unqualifying and unqualified....

which ever may be the answer,it will be 'digging reasons' to show another one incorrect ...lol
GMAT score is equally counted as your GPA and 78 clicks can change you life.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1