BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

A recent analysis of a new chemical element found on the

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:05 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

A recent analysis of a new chemical element found on the Moon showed that the new element could be used to substitute for several rare and extremely expensive metals used in space electronics. However, research conducted by an independent laboratory showed that some errors were made during analysis of the new element, and therefore, metals currently used in space electronics cannot be replaced with this element.

The argument above is flawed because it

(A)presumes, without providing justification, that if something is not proved to be true, then it must be wrong.

(B)fails to prove that independent research laboratories are more capable in chemical analysis than the laboratories that tested the new element.

(C)fails to consider the possibility of further accurate chemical analyses of the new element.

(D)fails to consider that laboratory tests conducted by only two institutions may not be sufficient to reach a definite conclusion.

(E)presumes, without providing justification, that results of research in which several errors were made can be considered to be trustworthy.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

edited:

by deloitte247 » Sun Jun 17, 2018 4:48 am
Here, we have a bit technical reasoning to do in order to arrive at a just conclusion.

In Option A - INCORRECT, we have a case of improper research which led to presumption. For the fact that something has not been proved to be true does not take away the fact that it could be true if and when subjected to Tests and experimental analysis. So, it's not a flaw of argument.

In Option B - INCORRECT .
This seem to be because the experiments were conducted at least in a laboratory, though still subject to other verification. It is not a point of weakness here.

In Option C - INCORRECT.
This statement of mine seek to suggest that there should be a way of seeking assertions and affirmative conclusion from other persons who equally have carried out such analysis.

In Option D - CORRECT.
This is true because the two analyses showed different results therefore, several others may need to come forward with their evaluation of the element before a justified conclusion can be reached.

In Option E - INCORRECT.
Here, one of the researching institutions can not overwhelmingly decide what happens in this case. They too might be wrong in their assessment.
Join the discussion