BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Difficult CR - newspaper articles .. please help

Expert replies
by NehaBhandari » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:40 pm
The recent proliferation of newspapaer articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention that publishers are more interested in selling copy than in printing the truth. Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud.

The above argument assumes that
a)newspaper stories of dubious authencity are a new phenomenon
b)minor publications do a better job of fact-checking than do major publications
c)everything a newspaper prints must be factually veriable
d)only recently have newspapers admitted to publishing erroneous stories
e)publishers are ultimately responsible for what is printed in their newspapers.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by aditi_bc » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:06 pm
Please post the OA with the argument. Use the 'spolier' function to mask the answer.

It is a tricky CR. I am confused between C and E though I would go with E.
Join the discussion

by Jatinder » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:48 pm
its E

E--- detroys the conclusion
C-- destroy the evidence

go with E
Keep flying
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:22 pm
imo:E

conclusion:publishers are more interested in selling copy than in printing the truth.
P1:The recent proliferation of newspapaer articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention

p2:Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud

E)publishers are ultimately responsible for what is printed in their newspapers

The conclusion is based on the fact that publishers can bend the information as they want.

Thus assumption should be:publishers are resposible for whatever is printed.

Now lets try to use negation rule:

E)publishers are ultimately not responsible for what is printed in their newspapers

If they are not resposible than they will not be able to bend the truth for publishing

Thus the conlclusion falls apart.

lets take C,

c)everything a newspaper prints must not be factually veriable.

The conclusion is not weakened or affected.

Thus E
Thanks
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:12 pm
Raunekk,
Well put!

OA is [spoiler]E)[/spoiler]

My 2 cents worth:

The key to answering assumption questions is to identify the conclusion correctly and the ask the question "Why could this be true" or "What unstated fact the author would have considered in concluding what he did"

Raunekk did exactly that in his own way....
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:32 pm
Raunekk,
Well put!
thanks cramya!!

it feels good when someone makes an extra effort to appreciate your work!! :)
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:40 pm
No probs! I always believe that due credit should go to the deserving :-)
Join the discussion

by NehaBhandari » Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:31 pm
Hey guys..
Thanks for the explanation.. I am a li'l hesitant to use the denial test .. I need to start using more often than not i guess...Thanks again :lol:
Join the discussion

by sam9999 » Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:22 am
cramya wrote:Raunekk,
Well put!

OA is [spoiler]E)[/spoiler]

My 2 cents worth:

The key to answering assumption questions is to identify the conclusion correctly and the ask the question "Why could this be true" or "What unstated fact the author would have considered in concluding what he did"

Raunekk did exactly that in his own way....
The key is "such obvious fraud". It might be the author's opinion.
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Fri May 13, 2016 1:32 am
I will Go with option E in this case
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Fri May 13, 2016 1:35 am
E seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion