POETRY Q5 1000 CR

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
Thanked: 13 times

POETRY Q5 1000 CR

by vivek.kapoor83 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:40 am
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. Yet Johnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.
Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?
(A) Although Johnson is right in criticizing Dickinson’s early editors for their distortion of her work, his own text is guilty of equally serious distortions.
(B) Johnson’s use of the dash in his text of Dickinson’s poetry misleads readers about the poet’s intentions.
(C) Because Dickinson never expected her poetry to be published, virtually any attempt at editing it must run counter to her intentions.
(D) Although Johnson’s attempt to produce a more faithful text of Dickinson’s poetry is well-meaning, his study of the material lacks sufficient thoroughness.
(E) Dickinson’s editors, including Johnson, have failed to deal adequately with the problem of deciphering Dickinson’s handwritten manuscripts
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:23 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 2 times

by banker1 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:36 am
IMO: B

Question:
Which of the following best summarizes the author’s main point?

Authors main point:
Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.

(A) is stated in the passage already, it doesn't summarize the author's point IMO

(B) best answer

(C) the wording is too strong IMO, must run counter ruined it for me

(D) Johnson's thoughtfulness is irrelevant

(E) out of scope IMO

What's the OA?
Last edited by banker1 on Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:22 am

by pkamoako » Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:37 am
i think it is A

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:23 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 2 times

by banker1 » Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:41 am
pkamoako wrote:i think it is A
Why?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 3:08 am
Thanked: 2 times

by James_83 » Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:36 pm
I think the option is A.

"To standardize Dickinson’s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print." ->>>>In this part of the argument, the author mentions about the use of dash by SOMEBODY...It is not clearly stated who is that person?But if you the argument again from starting, this may refer to editors. Editors are responsible for distorting the intentions and not Johnson.

Rest of the options are already explained by you. So, answer comes out to be A.

Please comment if there is a gap in my understanding.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:30 am
Looking at it now, A makes sense