BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Parallelism

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:26 am
by MinnieLiu » Tue Oct 15, 2013 1:04 am
From the Manhattan SC:
The flower bouquet was the husband's giving of love to his wife.
The two sides of the being verb was are flower bouquet and husband's giving of love.Why are the two sides not structurally parallel?
Thanks!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 184
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:04 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 10 times

by Mission2012 » Tue Oct 15, 2013 3:00 am
HI MinnieLiu,

The problem is not with parallelism but if an action noun (gift) is present then one should not use complex gerund. Complex gerunds are more complicated then action nouns.

Regards,
MinnieLiu wrote:From the Manhattan SC:
The flower bouquet was the husband's giving of love to his wife.
The two sides of the being verb was are flower bouquet and husband's giving of love.Why are the two sides not structurally parallel?
Thanks!
If you find my post useful -> please click on "Thanks"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:26 am

by MinnieLiu » Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:58 pm
But this is really from Parallelism.The Manhattan SC said that these two sides are not ctructurally parallel.In order to achieve parallelism, we can rewrite the sentence replacing giving with the noun gift,so that the two sides of the being verb are structurally similar:The flower bouquet was the husband's loving gift to his wife.
Mission2012 wrote:HI MinnieLiu,

The problem is not with parallelism but if an action noun (gift) is present then one should not use complex gerund. Complex gerunds are more complicated then action nouns.

Regards,
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:27 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 48 times

by vinay1983 » Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:19 pm
Try to understand what the sentence conveys. the husband"gifted the flower bouquet", so "he flower bouquet was a loving(adjective) "gift" to his wife. This is correct. "Gifting" is a process and not something that can be "gifted".

Hope i am clear
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1