BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

DS question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by moneyman » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:47 am
If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t?
(1) n = 3^n-z
(2) t = 3^n


Is the answer B??

(1) is insufficient because it does not say anything about t.

(2) is sufficient because n will be a factor of t if t/n is an integer..Statement 2 says that t=3^n ..Substitute values and you will find that all the values satisfy the condition..
Maxx
Join the discussion

by givemeanid » Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:06 am
(1) is insufficient. We don't know anything about t or z.
(2) is insufficient. t = 3^n. For n = 3, t = 27. n is a factor of t. For n = 5, t = 243. n is not a factor of t.

It is (E)
Join the discussion

by dunkin77 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:37 am
I also thought it was E but the answer seems to be C...
Join the discussion

Re: DS question

by bingojohn » Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:42 am
dunkin77 wrote:If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t?
(1) n = 3^n-z
(2) t = 3^n



Can anyone pls help?
dunkin77 are you sure you copied the question right.

n = 3^(n-?)
Join the discussion

by chatekar » Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:43 am
Even if we assume that statement 2 is saying that n = 3^(n-t)
still it doesn't help.

Dunkin77

Can you tell whats the OA and whats the source of this problem?
Join the discussion

by PennMI » Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:21 am
Is the question mistyped? If the "z" is supposed to be a "t", then I see how the answer is C...but, if not, then answer should be E.
Join the discussion

by bingojohn » Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:31 am
PennMI wrote:Is the question mistyped? If the "z" is supposed to be a "t", then I see how the answer is C...but, if not, then answer should be E.
Assuming 'z' is a mistyped characted, and its really 't', can you please explain how you arrived at [C], PennMI?
Join the discussion

by PennMI » Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:37 am
If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t?
(1) n = 3^n-z
(2) t = 3^n

If z is supposed to be t, here was my logic for "C":

(1) insufficient. No info about t.
(2) insufficient. if n = 2; t=9...answer is "no". if n=1; t=3...answer is "yes".

Rephrasing the question, it is asking if (t/n) is an integer. Taken together, if you look at t/n, you get (3^n)/(3^n-t). Due to same base, you can subtract exponents so, t/n = n-(n-t) = n-n+t = t. So, t/n = t. Because "t" is an integer, I would say "C".
Join the discussion

by PennMI » Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:41 am
I just re-read my post and noticed I wrote "due to" in my response. Just pointing out that that's wrong since you can't use "due to" in place of "because"; you can only use "due to" to replace "caused by". Just thought I'd throw in that little SC tidbit since my verbal skills are awful. Anyways, I think I'm starting to catch on :)
Join the discussion