rustlers are convicted

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1048
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 am
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
Followed by:27 members
GMAT Score:670

rustlers are convicted

by arora007 » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:03 am
Today, even when rustlers are convicted, their sentences tend to be light compared to the days of the early West when cattle rustlers were hanged from the nearest tree.

(A) compared to the days of the early West when
(B) compared with those in the days of the early West in which
(C) compared with those in the days of the early West when
(D) in comparison with them of the early Western days when
(E) in comparison to the days of the early West in which


[spoiler]OA is C, posting this as I marked it A,
needed to recall the rule compared with and not compared to is for similar things...[/spoiler]
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!
Source: — Sentence Correction |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1893
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 11:48 pm
Thanked: 215 times
Followed by:7 members

by kvcpk » Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:18 am
"compared with and not compared to is for similar things"

You are right..

Also, "when" is required in the end to indicate time.
And, "those" is also required to get right comparison.

This also narrows down to C.

Legendary Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:1 members

by paes » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:00 am
IMO C

I have not seen any OG problem based on the difference of 'compared with' vs 'compared to'
[Even I have read somewhere that it was a rule not tested in GMAT]

Just forget the rule, and see the problem.
only B, C are making the right comparison.

C is better because of the usage 'when'

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pm
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times
Followed by:2 members

by sumanr84 » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:03 am
paes wrote:IMO C

I have not seen any OG problem based on the difference of 'compared with' vs 'compared to'
[Even I have read somewhere that it was a rule not tested in GMAT]
paes is right about it.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:15 am
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Thanked: 3 times

by neha.patni » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:07 am
arora007 wrote:Today, even when rustlers are convicted, their sentences tend to be light compared to the days of the early West when cattle rustlers were hanged from the nearest tree.

(A) compared to the days of the early West when
(B) compared with those in the days of the early West in which
(C) compared with those in the days of the early West when
(D) in comparison with them of the early Western days when
(E) in comparison to the days of the early West in which


[spoiler]OA is C, posting this as I marked it A,
needed to recall the rule compared with and not compared to is for similar things...[/spoiler]
IMO C

A, E - Days compared with sentences
D - wordy
B - days are compared so it should be when

hence C

Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 am
Thanked: 173 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:09 am

User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1048
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:26 am
Location: India
Thanked: 51 times
Followed by:27 members
GMAT Score:670

by arora007 » Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:39 am
well... A could have been kicked out via parallelism...

and yes... i've traked down this post by Ron which you all guys are discussing... cool...
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/whe ... t2071.html

I don't know what I would have done without the forums...
https://www.skiponemeal.org/
https://twitter.com/skiponemeal
Few things are impossible to diligence & skill.Great works are performed not by strength,but by perseverance

pm me if you find junk/spam/abusive language, Lets keep our community clean!!

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 286
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Kolkata, India
Thanked: 11 times
Followed by:5 members

by pesfunk » Fri Nov 26, 2010 7:33 pm
Compare with OR Compare to >>> https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/whe ... t2071.html
arora007 wrote:well... A could have been kicked out via parallelism...

and yes... i've traked down this post by Ron which you all guys are discussing... cool...
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/whe ... t2071.html

I don't know what I would have done without the forums...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:33 am

by nisha.menon294 » Sun Nov 28, 2010 2:35 am
i have a question. I had thought that we use "when " in cases where we want to refer to a particular point in time an "in which" for cases where we refer to a time period. In this case early days is a time period as well. so why cant we use " in which" ? Thanks ..

• Page 1 of 1