Assumption Question - Nubians

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

Assumption Question - Nubians

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:38 pm
The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual
evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common
in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline.
B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.
C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease.
D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.
E. Typhus is generally fatal.

OA Later
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Thanked: 14 times

by Haaress » Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:03 pm
Is it B?

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:03 pm
Please explain
Haaress wrote:Is it B?
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 am
Thanked: 135 times
Followed by:7 members

by selango » Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:33 pm
IMO B

Apply Negation to option B.

Tetracycline is rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.

If tetracycline is made ineffective thru the baking and food process,then how come only few people affected by typhus?This weakens the argument.Hence B is correct..

OA?
--Anand--

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:37 pm
B is the OA
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pm
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:39 am
My pick is B

time: 01:51

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:07 pm
Thanked: 8 times
GMAT Score:730

by PurpleReign » Tue Aug 03, 2010 10:59 am
I chose B through process of elimination:

Conclusion: Tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.


A. Infectious diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed are unaffected by tetracycline.

Outisde of scope


C. Typhus cannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with the infectious agents of this disease.
The argument isn't about how typhus is transmitted, so this was eliminated.

D. Bread and beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.
It doesn't matter if there were other items that contained tetracycline. If there are other items, it doesn't effect the conclusion.

E. Typhus is generally fatal.
While this may be true, the passage doesn't talk about mortality rates. It just mentions evidence of the disease on the skeletons.

So I was left with B and it made the most sense:

B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer.

We know that tetracycline is an antibiotic. We know that it is present on dried grain. But the passage doesn't talk about the effects of using that grain in making bread or beer. So in order to accept the conclusion we are assuming that the antibiotic remains potent after processing.