BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

probability of EXACTLY ONE 6 in 7 rolls of a fair die

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GmatMathPro » Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:21 pm
Prob of 6 on any given roll=1/6
Prob of non-6 on any given roll=5/6

You can get exactly one six in 7 ways:

Probability of six on first roll and non-6 on every other roll: (1/6)(5/6)(5/6)(5/6)(5/6)(5/6)(5/6)=(1/6)(5/6)^6

OR

Probability of six on second roll and non-6 on every other roll: (5/6)(1/6)(5/6)(5/6)(5/6)(5/6)(5/6)=(1/6)(5/6)^6

and so on....You could get the six on any of the 7 rolls, each of which has a probability of (1/6)(5/6)^6. Add all of these probabilities together to get the overall probability. This is the same as multiplying (1/6)(5/6)^6 by 7

Ans: (7/6)(5/6)^6
Pete Ackley
GMAT Math Pro
Free Online Tutoring Trial
Join the discussion

by sdilmanian » Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:49 am
Thanks, understood. But I am now having trouble with the following (seems very simple but I cannot conceptualize it):

P(at least one H in two flips of a fair coin)
Using the P(X) + P(Y) - P(X AND Y), the answer is:
= P(H on first flip) + P(H on second flip) - P (H on both first and second flips)
=1/2 + 1/2 - 1/4 = 3/4

The last separate probability is confusing me, because shouldn't that scenario (heads on both flips) be included in "the probability of AT LEAST one H"??

Thanks again!
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:55 am
P(Atleast 1 head on 2 spins) = 1 - P(Getting tails on both)

= 1 - (1/2 * 1/2) = 3/4.
Last edited by shankar.ashwin on Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by GmatMathPro » Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:24 am
sdilmanian wrote:Thanks, understood. But I am now having trouble with the following (seems very simple but I cannot conceptualize it):

P(at least one H in two flips of a fair coin)
Using the P(X) + P(Y) - P(X AND Y), the answer is:
= P(H on first flip) + P(H on second flip) - P (H on both first and second flips)
=1/2 + 1/2 - 1/4 = 3/4

The last separate probability is confusing me, because shouldn't that scenario (heads on both flips) be included in "the probability of AT LEAST one H"??

Thanks again!
Yes, the probability of getting both heads SHOULD be counted in the probability of getting at least one head. We subtract it not because we don't want to count it at all, but because we don't want to count it twice. When you do P(H on first flip) + P(H on second flip) you count the probability of getting heads on both flips twice, but we only want to count that possibility once, so we subtract it. If you don't see why, look at it this way:

If we flip a coin twice, there are 4 possibilities: TT, HT, TH, HH.

How many ways do we get heads on the first toss? 2-HT, HH

How many ways do we get heads on the second toss? 2-TH, HH

How many ways do we get heads on first OR second toss? If we just add the above two answers together we get 4. Which would imply 4/4 or 100% chance of getting at least one head. But that's clearly wrong. You can see if we just add these outcomes together we have HT, TH, HH, HH. HH was counted twice because it falls under both categories. We only want to count it once, though, not twice, so that's why we subtract it at the end. It's the same as those Venn diagram problems with overlapping sets, if you're familiar with those.
Pete Ackley
GMAT Math Pro
Free Online Tutoring Trial
Join the discussion

by rijul007 » Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:38 am
7*(1/6)*(5/6)^6
Join the discussion