BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tought SC problem for me.

Expert replies
by ace001 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:24 pm
Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF 19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planet wide destruction.
A. NO change
B. and if it would strike Earth, part of the planet could experience a tremendous amount of damage but it would
C. and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would
D. and that, if Earth is struck by it, can do part of the plant tremendous damage, but it would
E. and that, if it strikes Earth, it could experience a tremendous amount of damage but

the correct answer is C why?? can someone explain this answer over A?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by papgust » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:49 pm
which part of sentence is underlined?

Please underline the sentence.
Download GMAT Math and CR questions with Solutions from Instructors and High-scorers:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/download-gma ... 59366.html

-----------

GO GREEN..! GO VEG..!

Daily Quote:
"Stop feeling sorry for the Butcher if you had to go Veg. The butcher can find another job but the poor animal cannot get back its life"
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:37 pm
I believe the question is something like this:
Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF 19, that is about half a mile wide and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but probably not cause planet wide destruction.

A. and, if it strikes Earth, it can do tremendous damage to part of the planet but
B. and if it would strike Earth, part of the planet could experience a tremendous amount of damage but it would
C. and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would
D. and that, if Earth is struck by it, can do part of the plant tremendous damage, but it would
E. and that, if it strikes Earth, it could experience a tremendous amount of damage but
First of all we need to realize that, since all the options start with and, we need parallelism in the sentence. and in the original sentence is a parallel connector, so we need the structure "that... and that.." - (X and Y) in the sentence. So options A and B are ruled out.

Lets check C , D and E now.

We can rule out D because "if Earth is struck by it" is passive and awkward construction. We need this part of the sentence in subjunctive tense because it represents a hypothetical condition.

We rule out E because, although E uses that after and, it still doesn't maintain the parallelism, since that is not followed by a verb as done in the first part of the sentence. Subjunctive tense is also missing.

The correct answer C maintains the required parallelism and correctly uses the required subjunctive tense - "if it were to strike Earth"

Observe the parallelism in C. Notice that both that are followed by a verb.

Scientists have identified an asteroid, 2000 BF 19, that is about half a mile wide (X) and that, if it were to strike Earth, could do tremendous damage to part of the planet (Y) but would probably not cause planet wide destruction.

that is about half a mile wide (X)
that could do tremendous damage to part of the planet (Y)


X and Y are both parallel here. So construction "X and Y" is grammatically correct in C.

There is another internal parallelism maintained in C that we need to check.

but at the end of option C is also a parallel connector. So we need to make sure that in "X but Y" construction, both X and Y are parallel.

Notice in C,

could do tremendous damage to part of the planet (X)
would probably not cause planet wide destruction (Y)


X and Y are both parallel here. So construction "X but Y" is grammatically correct.

Hope that helps..
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:54 pm
Adding to Jadeja's explanation :

E is also wrong because of the meaning of the sentence :

if it strikes Earth, it could experience a tremendous amount of damage but ..

seems that asteroid will experience a damage, not earth.
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:59 pm
Yes, i agree with you.. another reason to rule out E.
Join the discussion

by apex231 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:45 am
The only thing that I didn't like about option C is that it sounds little incomplete. Should it not have an "it" just before could. Otherwise it is perfect.

C. and that, if it were to strike Earth, (it) could do tremendous damage to part of the planet but would.
Join the discussion

by risingsaisha » Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:40 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1