thanks for helping me out but I still have a doubt i.e isn't the usage of not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang itself explanatory that after buying basketball they won't buy skis and a boomerang???????Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:no, it's fine where it is. You actually need it there. Think about it: if you take out the as well, you don't know whether the impulse buyer buys the skis and boomerang as well as the basketball, or instead of the basketball. The additional phrase actually eliminates ambiguity.aspirant2011 wrote:Hi geva, isn't the usage of as well awkward in D????Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:There's nothing grammatically wrong in C, but there's definitely a distorted/illogical meaning. The last few posts are close to putting their finger on the issue: C puts all three verbs on the same level: do very little impulse buying, do not buy skis and boomerang, leave with basketball. This is a conceptual mistake, rather than a grammar one: the last two portions are a lower level example of "very little impulse shopping", and should be separated from the main clause.
D correctly puts the first part (Do very little shopping) on a separate level above the remaining two clauses with the use of the semicolon separating verb one from its examples.
GMATPrep - comparison, effective sentence
-
aspirant2011
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
-
sameerballani
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
@aspirant2011aspirant2011 wrote:thanks for helping me out but I still have a doubt i.e isn't the usage of not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang itself explanatory that after buying basketball they won't buy skis and a boomerang???????Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:no, it's fine where it is. You actually need it there. Think about it: if you take out the as well, you don't know whether the impulse buyer buys the skis and boomerang as well as the basketball, or instead of the basketball. The additional phrase actually eliminates ambiguity.aspirant2011 wrote:Hi geva, isn't the usage of as well awkward in D????Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:There's nothing grammatically wrong in C, but there's definitely a distorted/illogical meaning. The last few posts are close to putting their finger on the issue: C puts all three verbs on the same level: do very little impulse buying, do not buy skis and boomerang, leave with basketball. This is a conceptual mistake, rather than a grammar one: the last two portions are a lower level example of "very little impulse shopping", and should be separated from the main clause.
D correctly puts the first part (Do very little shopping) on a separate level above the remaining two clauses with the use of the semicolon separating verb one from its examples.
D. those in department stores, do very little impulse shopping; someone who comes in for a basketball will leave with a basketball only and not buy a pair of skis and a boomerang as well
I understand this is a small subtle point. Just an advice, Try reading this sentence both with and without AS WELL many times.
You will feel as well helps in differentiating two events and not list of items.
Also, if we remove as well(read it once more
I hope I make some sense !!
-
nafiul9090
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:19 am
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:2 members
i just read thread of Ron
https://www.beatthegmat.com/companies-in ... tml#368498
if i didnt read that first i would pick C
the issue between C and D is logical meaning over grammatical justification
regards nafi
https://www.beatthegmat.com/companies-in ... tml#368498
if i didnt read that first i would pick C
the issue between C and D is logical meaning over grammatical justification
regards nafi












