-
vivek.kapoor83
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 833
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
- Thanked: 13 times
gmatpre-4
This topic has expert replies
Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction |
-
piyush_nitt
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Sydney
- Thanked: 12 times
-
parallel_chase
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
- Thanked: 146 times
- Followed by:2 members
IMO C
We already have "although" in non underlined part to show the contrast, therefore we dont need "while" to show contrast again.
Eliminate - D & E
option A - that there would be a resurgence - awkward + wordy
Option B - "it" has no antecedent.
Hence C.
OA?
We already have "although" in non underlined part to show the contrast, therefore we dont need "while" to show contrast again.
Eliminate - D & E
option A - that there would be a resurgence - awkward + wordy
Option B - "it" has no antecedent.
Hence C.
OA?
No rest for the Wicked....
-
maihuna
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 1:49 am
- Thanked: 82 times
- Followed by:9 members
- GMAT Score:720
I can see the 2/3 splits is for the test of conjunction and vs while
and seems preferable, as though there is some sort of contrast...price rise is because of temporary reasons and it didn't necessarily mean a surge in inflation..
so out of 1 2 3:
2 is out
what abt 3: do u agree foreshadow a surge...
I think though lengthy 1 is correct...comments
and grammatical point to kill A vs C...
I bet A.
and seems preferable, as though there is some sort of contrast...price rise is because of temporary reasons and it didn't necessarily mean a surge in inflation..
so out of 1 2 3:
2 is out
what abt 3: do u agree foreshadow a surge...
I think though lengthy 1 is correct...comments
and grammatical point to kill A vs C...
I bet A.
