old-style capitalist

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 4:35 pm
Followed by:4 members

old-style capitalist

by Ankitaverma » Wed Nov 20, 2013 12:49 pm
Most large corporations in the United States were once run by individual capitalists who owned enough stock to dominate the board of directors and dictate company policy. Because putting such large amounts of stock on the market would only depress its value, they could not sell out for a quick profit and instead had to concentrate on improving the long-term productivity of their companies. Today, with few exceptions, the stock of large United States corporations is held by large institutions-pension funds, for example-and because these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company's stock and from actively influencing a company's decision-making, they can enhance their wealth only by buying and selling stock in anticipation of fluctuations in its value. A minority shareholder is necessarily a short-term trader. As a result, United States productivity is unlikely to improve unless shareholders and the managers of the companies in which they invest are encouraged to enhance long-term productivity (and hence long-term profitability), rather than simply to maximize short-term profits.

Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today's short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow's long-term capitalistic investors. The legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removed, and such institutions encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they invest. In addition, any institution that holds twenty percent or more of a company's stock should be forced to give the public one day's notice of the intent to sell those shares. Unless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet and, like the old-time capitalists, major investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies' productivity. Such measures would force financial institutions to become capitalists whose success depends not on trading shares at the propitious moment, but on increasing the productivity of the companies in which they invest.

The passage supports which of the following statements?

(A) Antitrust laws prevent any single shareholder from acquiring a majority of the stock in a corporation.

(B) Institutions that intend to sell a large block of stock in a single corporation must give at least twenty-four hours notice of the sale.

(C) In most corporations it is the board of directors rather than the corporate managers who make policy decisions.

(D) The sudden sale of a large amount of stock in any one corporation makes the value of the stock go down.

(E) The way corporations are currently run, it is unlikely that increased productivity would lead to short-term increases in stock values.

Q/A-D why not a or b
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 8:22 am
Thanked: 1 times

by Sankeerthana » Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:26 am
Hi,

A. According to the passage, "these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company's stock and from actively influencing a company's decision-making,". We can only infer that antitrust laws prohibit institutions from owning a majority of a company's stock, but we cannot generalize that the antitrust law applies to any single shareholder. Incorrect.

B. This is the author's opinion and not a existing practice. If this ans choice contains the terms, "In the author's opinion" or "The author believes that..", then it can be considered correct. But it is not an existing law and is hence incorrect.

C. "Most large corporations in the United States were once run by individual capitalists"-->This was once the case, which implies that it is not the same today. Incorrect.

D. The phrases "Because putting such large amounts of stock on the market would only depress its value," "the value of the stock would plummet" suggest that (in the past and even today) the value of stock would decrease if there were a sudden sale of stock. Correct.

E. This is out of scope.Incorrect.
Hope it helps

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:24 am

by bernadettemillow » Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:30 am
Well done, this is the best way of preparation for any test, say, GMAT prep, SAT prep, ACT prep. Online studying or tutoring helps you clear your doubt very fast and also at an affordable rate.