Not....But and parallelism

BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

This topic has expert replies

Post new topic Locked

Previous Topic Next Topic

Amadalia: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 76; Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 3:24 am; Thanked: 3 times

Not....But and parallelism

by Amadalia » Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:04 am

Good day
Accordin to the rule "NOT A but B" is a parallelism structure in which A should be similar to B.
But in page 160 of Manhattan SC I've found out the following sentence.
The agency is NOT a fully independent entity BUT INSTEAD derives its authority from Congress. (note that the verbs is and derives are parallel)
According to the inside rule a fully independant entity should be parallel to other noun or noun phrase, not a clause, and second how can is be parallel to derives in this sentence??!!!
Many thanks in advance.

Quote

Source: Beat The GMAT — Sentence Correction | Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:04 am

GMAT/MBA Expert

[email protected]: Elite Legendary Member; Posts: 10392; Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm; Location: Palo Alto, CA; Thanked: 2867 times; Followed by:511 members; GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:35 pm

Hi Amadalia,

This example poses an interesting "problem", but it's not as bad as you think. You are correct that 2-part phrases require "parallelism" rules.

The sentence would be better if it compared two nouns OR two descriptions.

eg. The agency is NOT fully independent BUT INSTEAD derives authority from Congress.

Modifiers (in this case "fully independent") are supposed to be right next to the noun that they modify. In this sentence though, they're somewhat far from the word "agency." The solution to this problem is to place the noun (or equivalent) into each of the 2 phrases.

Now we have...

The agency is not a fully independent ENTITY but instead derives ITS authority from Congress.

Here we have the intent/references to 2 nouns. I don't love this sentence, but it's not terrible.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Contact Rich at [email protected]

Quote

Amadalia: Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts; Posts: 76; Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 3:24 am; Thanked: 3 times

by Amadalia » Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:59 am

Thanks RICH for you prompt reply,

eg. The agency is NOT fully independent BUT INSTEAD derives authority from Congress.

Modifiers (in this case "fully independent") are supposed to be right next to the noun that they modify. In this sentence though, they're somewhat far from the word "agency."

Is not fully independant right next to the noun it modifies??

The agency is not a fully independent ENTITY but instead derives ITS authority from Congress

According to my modest understanding, not X but instead Y rule, this sentence is still not parallel , as it contrast a noun phrase to an entire clause.

Many thanks in advance and keep in mind that I'm not a native speaker so What might appear obvious to you might not be so for me.

Quote

GMATGuruNY: GMAT Instructor; Posts: 15539; Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm; Location: New York, NY; Thanked: 13060 times; Followed by:1906 members; GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Feb 25, 2014 10:35 am

Amadalia wrote: The agency is NOT a fully independent entity BUT INSTEAD derives its authority from Congress.

Simple tense forms of to be include is, are, was, and were.
Simple tense forms of to be cannot follow not but must PRECEDE it:
John IS NOT a runner.
The shirts WERE NOT red.

In the sentence above, NOT X BUT Y serves to connect two verb phrases:
X = IS a fully independent entity
Y = DERIVES its authority from Congress

Since the verb in X is a simple tense form of to be, it must precede not:
The agency IS NOT a fully independent entity BUT [instead] DERIVES its authority from Congress.

In the second verb phrase, instead serves as an adverbial modifier.
HOW does the agency derive its authority?
The agency derives its authority INSTEAD.
It is fine for the second phrase to include an adverb not included in the first phrase.

Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3