Meteorite

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 11:44 am
Thanked: 2 times

Meteorite

by didieravoaka » Tue Oct 20, 2015 6:12 am
In 1994, a team of scientists led by David McKay began studying the meteorite ALH84001, which had been discovered in Antarctica in 1984.Two years later, the McKay team announced that ALH84001, which scientists generally agree originated on Mars, contained compelling evidence that life once existed on Mars. This evidence includes the discovery of organic molecules in ALH84001, the first ever found in Martian rock. Organic molecules--complex, carbonbased compounds--form the basis for terrestrial life. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAH's. When microbes die, their organic material often decays into PAH's.

Skepticism about the McKay team's claim remains, however. For example, ALH84001 has been on earth for 13,000 years, suggesting to some scientists that its PAH's might have resulted form terrestrial contamination. However, McKay's team has demonstrated that the concentration of PAH's increases as one looks deeper into ALH84001, contrary to what one would expect from terrestrial contamination.The skeptic's strongest argument, however, is that processes unrelated to organic life can easily produce all the evidence found by McKay' steam, including PAH's. For example, star formation produces PAH's. Moreover, PAH's frequently appear in other meteorites, and no one attributes their presence to life processes. Yet McKay's team notes that the particular combination of PAH's in ALH84001 is more similar to the combinations produced by decaying organisms than to those originating form nonbiological processes.

Q1: The passage asserts which of the following about the claim that ALH84001 originated on Mars?

A. It was initially proposed by the McKay team of scientists.
B. It is not a matter of widespread scientific dispute.
C. It has been questioned by some skeptics of the McKay team's work.
D. It has been undermined by recent work on PAH's.
E. It is incompatible with the face that ALH84001 has been on Earth for 13,000 years.

Q2: The primary purpose of the passage is to

A. describe new ways of studying the possibility that life once existed on Mars
B. revise a theory regarding the existence of life on Mars in light of new evidence
C. reconcile conflicting viewpoints regarding the possibility that life once existed on Mars
D. evaluate a recently proposed argument concerning the origin of ALH84001
E. describe a controversy concerning the significance of evidence from ALH84001

Q3: The passage suggests that the fact that ALH84001 has been on earth for 13,000 years has been used by some scientists to support which of the following claims about ALH84001?

A. ALH84001 may not have originated on Mars.
B. ALH84001 contains PAH's that are the result of nonbiological processes.
C. ALH84001 may not have contained PAH's when it landed on Earth.
D. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 are not PAH's.
E. The organic molecules found in ALH84001 could not be the result of terrestrial contamination.

I don't understand why the answer is B,E, C. Could you please explain? I got A,E,A.
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 10:57 pm
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by mindful » Tue Oct 20, 2015 7:43 am
Hi Marc,

If you notice carefully, you will find that the "origin from Mars" claim was not initially proposed by the David Mckay team first because the meteorite "(which)scientists generally agree originated on Mars". So while I initially chose C, which is also wrong (because skeptics haven't doubted that it comes from Mars, skeptics only doubt that it had "sign of Martian life", the answer is B, because the same sentence proves that it is not disputed that the meteorite came from Mars. So that's the first question.

The primary purpose certainly seems E. Again, in the third question -- the meteorite's being on earth for 13K years has taken some scientists to NOT dispute that it originated from Mars, but to dispute that the PAH (taken to be a sign of organic life) has roots in Mars. They argue that since the meteorite has been on the earth for so many years, it may have experienced "terrestrial contamination", that is to say, may have absorbed 'organic elements' from the earth. This means that when it landed on earth, it may not have contained PAH, which is your answer C.