BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Is it run on sentence?

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:23 pm
Thanked: 10 times
by umeshpatil » Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:19 pm
As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales they would in the past have conceded to rivals.
A they would in the past have conceded to rivals.
B they would have conceded previously to their rivals
C that in the past would have been conceded previously to rivals
D it previously would have conceded to rivals in the past
E it would in the past have conceded to rivals
they would in the past have conceded to rivals
is a meaningful sentence. There is no punctuation or conjunction to join it with previous part. It seems it is not connected with rest of the sentence properly. Can anyone explain how this is correct?

[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 768
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:18 pmFollowed by: 140 members
Location: Berkeley, CA
Thanked: 387 times

by Mike@Magoosh » Wed Sep 18, 2013 3:34 pm
umeshpatil wrote:As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales they would in the past have conceded to rivals.
A they would in the past have conceded to rivals.
B they would have conceded previously to their rivals
C that in the past would have been conceded previously to rivals
D it previously would have conceded to rivals in the past
E it would in the past have conceded to rivals
they would in the past have conceded to rivals
is a meaningful sentence. There is no punctuation or conjunction to join it with previous part. It seems it is not connected with rest of the sentence properly. Can anyone explain how this is correct?

[spoiler]OA: E[/spoiler]
Dear umeshpatil,

I'm happy to help. :-)

First of all, here's a lesson about run-on sentences:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/lessons/916-run-on-sentences

Here's version (E), the OA:
As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales it would in the past have conceded to rivals.

What this sentence does is omit an implicit "that" --- here's the sentence again with the implied word included:
As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments, the company has become increasingly willing to compete for the mass market sales that it would in the past have conceded to rivals.
Folks omit the word "that" all the time in colloquial speech, but usually the GMAT is above this sort of behavior. It's a bit funny to see it in an official question --- I believe this is one that did not survive into the OG13, so perhaps they became uncomfortable with its relative informality.

What you cite is not actually an independent clause, but really part of a subordinate clause, a clause beginning with "that" and modifying the noun "market sales".

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1556
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pmFollowed by: 34 members
Thanked: 448 times
GMAT Score:650

by theCodeToGMAT » Wed Sep 18, 2013 8:08 pm
A - INCORRECT. "they" is wrong
B - INCORRECT. "they" & "their" is wrong
C - INCORRECT. "previously" and "past" are redundant
D - INCORRECT. "previously" and "past" are redundant
E - CORRECT

This is not an RUN-On sentence since "As its sales of computer products have surpassed those of measuring instruments" is NOT a modifier; it is a part of sentence...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:23 pm
Thanked: 10 times

by umeshpatil » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:23 am
Thanks a ton Mike. This clears my doubt. You are really awesome guy !
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1