Retaking GMAT in 4 weeks...need expert advice on prep

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:29 pm
I need some advice. I started preparing for my GMAT in mid Dec and gave my GMAT exam on 29th Jan. I got a 550 score (44Q AND 23V) and 5 in my AWA.

I had a huge timing issue. I was fine with the essay but with the quantitative section, I focussed too much on the first few questions and had to guess the last 10 questions.

Although in my 10 min break, I wanted to completely take my mind off my poor performance in quantitative section, it came to haunt me in verbal. I couldn't stop myself looking at the stop watch and basically messed up my verbal section. RC is my weakest point in verbal as I cannot concentrate enough and my initial strategy was to give in my best in RC and ace in CR and SC...

Anyways, I am planning to give it again in four weeks. I know I should be focusing on time, RC and time...but where can I get more practice material?

I initially practiced from OG, Kaplan and Princeton guide books and few sample test papers that I bought from mba.com. However, because I already know those questions, I may not be able to improve my timing in the real sense by going over the same questions. What should I do? :roll:
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Feb 09, 2009 3:06 pm
I received a PM asking me to reply.

Okay, so you already know your problems - timing on quant, nerves in general (though hopefully those will go away, mostly, if you fix your timing issues), and RC. That's good.

For the OG stuff, did you use all three of the current books? (OG11, Quant Supplement, Verbal Supplement) You can also get OG10, which has about 75% overlap with the current books, but 25% of the questions are different. For quant, you can also use GMAT Focus, an online-only product that is also from the official makers of the test (go to www.gmatfocus.com).

I would also dispute your notion that you can't improve your timing by going over those same problems again. :) You didn't do *all* of those problems in 2 minutes (or less) the first time around, or you wouldn't have gone over so much during the real test. So you do need to go back and look at some of those again, and ask yourself:
- how do I recognize what this problem is telling me?
- how do I recognize what the problem is asking me?
- those two things should tell me what to do with the problem; I should follow the same approach that I have used successfully on some other, similar problem in the past. So what is that approach?
- what else could I do here? Is there a better / faster way to do it? (Often, the first way we try to do a new problem is NOT the best way to do it... unless we recognized that problem as similar to another one we studied in the past and we'd already figured out the best way to do that past problem.)
- how can I make an educated guess? (Even if I got it right... in fact, it's often easier to learn how to make an educated guess when you got the problem right in the first place.)

Until you can answer those questions, you're not done studying a problem.

Also, recognize = I know within 15-30 seconds what to do because I remember seeing something like this before, I know that this problem is of the same type as that older one, and I remember how I approached the similar problem last time. Recognize does not mean "I spend 45+ seconds figuring out what it all means and then I 'recognize' it." ;)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 7:29 pm

by malhotneha » Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:37 am
Thanks Stacey,

I will try your suggestions and will let you know if I come across any hurdles.

Cheers.