BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Veritas Session - Peat Harvesting

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570
by reply2spg » Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:18 am
Does this CR needs technical knowledge, such as peat. flora and fauna? What is peat?

Opponents of peat harvesting in this country argue that it would alter the ecological balance of our peat-rich wetlands and that, as a direct consequence of this, much of the country's water supply would be threatened with contamination. But this cannot be true, for in Ireland, where peat has been harvested for centuries, the water supply is not contaminated. We can safely proceed with the harvesting of peat.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) Over hundreds of years, the ecological balance of all areas changes slowly but significantly, sometimes to the advantage of certain flora and fauna.
(B) The original ecology of the peat-harvesting areas of Ireland was virtually identical to that of the undisturbed wetlands of this country.
(C) The activities of the other industries in coming years are likely to have adverse effects on the water supply of this country.
(D) The peat resources of this country are far larger than those of some countries that successfully harvest peat.
(E) The peat-harvesting industry of Ireland has been able to supply most of that country's fuel for generations.

No OA

IMO B
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:21 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:760

by barcebal » Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:29 am
I also think that the OA is B.

I don't think that you need technical or outside knowledge. The GMAT, however, does want you to FEEL confused

So you could substitute the word peat with anything. So you could say "Opponents of apple harvesting in this country..." It will all still work because the GMAT cannot require you to know outside things about peat. In some ways it can be a blessing to not know a lot about something in an argument because you may lean toward "trick" answer choices that seem to play to your knowledge.

Try reading and analyzing the passage again with the word apples and see if that helps.
Last edited by barcebal on Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:46 am
Thanked: 27 times
GMAT Score:570

by reply2spg » Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:40 am
Do you mean B or A? Thanks for your inputs
barcebal wrote:I also think that the OA is A.

I don't think that you need technical or outside knowledge. The GMAT, however, does want you to FEEL confused

So you could substitute the word peat with anything. So you could say "Opponents of apple harvesting in this country..." It will all still work because the GMAT cannot require you to know outside things about peat. In some ways it can be a blessing to not know a lot about something in an argument because you may lean toward "trick" answer choices that seem to play to your knowledge.

Try reading and analyzing the passage again with the word apples and see if that helps.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:21 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 12 times
GMAT Score:760

by barcebal » Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:48 am
Ha!

Sorry, I meant B
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times

by adi_800 » Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:27 pm
Has to be B so that both countries can be compared..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:16 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 29 times
GMAT Score:710

by debmalya_dutta » Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:20 pm
My pick is B....

(A) Over hundreds of years, the ecological balance of all areas changes slowly but significantly, sometimes to the advantage of certain flora and fauna. - no relevance
(B) The original ecology of the peat-harvesting areas of Ireland was virtually identical to that of the undisturbed wetlands of this country. - this establishes that the current condition of the country's land is the same as that in Ireland when peat harvesting began
(C) The activities of the other industries in coming years are likely to have adverse effects on the water supply of this country. - no relevance
(D) The peat resources of this country are far larger than those of some countries that successfully harvest peat.- no relevance
(E) The peat-harvesting industry of Ireland has been able to supply most of that country’s fuel for generations.- no relevance
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 135 times

by selango » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:03 pm
IMO B
--Anand--
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1031
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pmFollowed by: 255 members
Location: Malibu, CA
Thanked: 716 times
GMAT Score:750

by Brian@VeritasPrep » Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:37 pm
Hey guys,

Nice job here - the official answer is, indeed, B. Choice B links the peat harvesting processes in Ireland to those "in this country" by demonstrating that the environments are similar, so it strengthens the argument (B would work as a good assumption answer, too, as we really need to link the Ireland premise more to the conclusion about this country).

Great point on the fact that the GMAT loves to use technical language to make you feel more confused than you need to be. Whenever I'm confused on technical language - and even as a native English speaker that happens to me a fair amount - I'll just replace it with variables like X and Y. That way, the argument is essentially:

Opponents of harvesting X say that it will alter the ecological balance. But in Ireland, they've harvested X for centuries without any problems. Therefore, we can safely proceed with harvesting X.

It doesn't really matter what "X" is (peat, corn, whatever) - the real issue is whether the logic makes sense.

I'm a big fan of "pay attention to the words you know to be important and don't worry about those you don't know at all". You know that words like "therefore", "however", etc. are always important, so look carefully for those, and fill in details with variables as needed.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep

Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:37 pm

by gana » Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:47 pm
barcebal wrote:I also think that the OA is B.

I don't think that you need technical or outside knowledge. The GMAT, however, does want you to FEEL confused

So you could substitute the word peat with anything. So you could say "Opponents of apple harvesting in this country..." It will all still work because the GMAT cannot require you to know outside things about peat. In some ways it can be a blessing to not know a lot about something in an argument because you may lean toward "trick" answer choices that seem to play to your knowledge.

Try reading and analyzing the passage again with the word apples and see if that helps.
Yeah, I feel the same way you do. It has been working for me so far :)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 11:26 am
Thanked: 9 times

by tgou008 » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:49 am
I liked this one, I thought that B was clealry the right answer. The other responses were all unrelated / unrelevant.

This kind of reminded me of a 'fill the gap' assumption CR question. I thought as I read the extract, that sure the Ireland example provides support for the notion that peat harvesting will not harm the ecological balance of our wetlands - but are the two environments (our wetlands vs. Ireleand) similar enough for the comparison to be valid? Sure enough, B happened to 'fill this gap' or provide the strongest support for the authors argument.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:55 am
Thanked: 12 times

by wayofjungle » Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:36 pm
Did you catch that excellent pronoun error in the first sentence?

"Opponents of peat harvesting in this country argue that it would alter the ecological balance of our peat-rich wetlands and that"

In this sentence, 'it' is actually referring to the country arguing, not the opponents.

Sentence corrections aside, 'B' is definitely the best answer as it clears the analogy assumption that the US is comparable to Ireland.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 9:13 pmFollowed by: 1 member

by Andreweng » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:09 pm
B is the clear winner. I found the other answer choices to be unrelated or irrelevant. By the way, what's the source of this problem?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 amFollowed by: 15 members
Thanked: 56 times

by AIM GMAT » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:46 pm
IMO B too .
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:34 am
Location: Mumbai

by Shankenstein » Mon May 30, 2011 5:30 am
answer is B. I guess I'm too late but still :D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:38 pm

by Dee T » Mon May 30, 2011 6:20 pm
I chose B.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply