BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Gmat prep divisibility

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times

Re: Gmat prep divisibility

by sudhir3127 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:34 pm
Vignesh.4384 wrote:Hi can any one solve this?

OA = E

But i thought B was enough to conclude.

Please explain
I go with B as well..

In such type of question u shud be able to answer either YES or NO.

statement 1. k is divisible by 4.

if its 64 then Yes and if its 12 then its NO.

hence insufficient.

Statement 2. Exactly 4 different prime factors.

take 2*3*5*7 = 210 ..NO .. and its no for all the numbers.

Hence B

hope that helps..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
Thanked: 5 times

Re: Gmat prep divisibility

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:41 pm
sudhir3127 wrote:
Vignesh.4384 wrote:Hi can any one solve this?

OA = E

But i thought B was enough to conclude.

Please explain
I go with B as well..

In such type of question u shud be able to answer either YES or NO.

statement 1. k is divisible by 4.

if its 64 then Yes and if its 12 then its NO.

hence insufficient.

Statement 2. Exactly 4 different prime factors.

take 2*3*5*7 = 210 ..NO .. and its no for all the numbers.

Hence B

hope that helps..
I am just curious cos the official OA says E .
U think GMAT prep answer could be wrng ?
Please see the attachment below
Attachments
easy but diff.JPG
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 829
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:09 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Location: INDIA
Thanked: 84 times

Re: Gmat prep divisibility

by sudhir3127 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:52 pm
sudhir3127 wrote:
Vignesh.4384 wrote:Hi can any one solve this?

OA = E

But i thought B was enough to conclude.

Please explain
I go with B as well..

In such type of question u shud be able to answer either YES or NO.

statement 1. k is divisible by 4.

if its 64 then Yes and if its 12 then its NO.

hence insufficient.

Statement 2. Exactly 4 different prime factors.

take 2*3*5*7 = 210 ..NO .. and its no for all the numbers.

Hence B

hope that helps..
hey sorrie abt that confusion...

Its E as the OA says..

as i said A is insufficent..

Statement 2. if we consider the number 2^2*3^2*5^2*7^2.. then its a perfect square (210)^2..

Again this is Yes and No.. so insufficient.

together as well its insufficent.

Hence E.

do let me know if u have any doubts...
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:03 pm
I got it now.
Thank u .
I mis understood the word "exact"
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1