BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

usage of "more" for two different problem types.

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by ildude02 » Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:43 am
I'm trying to understand the difference between these 2 questions

1)In a mayoral election, Candidate X received 1/3 more votes than candidate Y. If candidate Y received 2400 votes, how many votes did candidate X receive".

2)In a mayoral election, Candidate X received 300 more votes than candidate Y. If candidate Y received 2400 votes, how many votes did candidate X recevie".



They both sound similar but the equation differs, at least the way I have it.

For question 2, I would say, X= Y+300; so X= 2700 votes; No issues I beleive.

For question 1 also, I did the same way, but apparently it's not right. I had, x= y+1/3 => x = 2400 + 1/3; But I later realized that you cannot have a fraction greater then the other person when talking about votes(or may be there can be a fraction of vote since it's indeed a number), it doesn't make sense. So it should be more like, X= Y+(1/3)(Y) =>x= 4/3 * y= >4/3 * 2400 = 3200 votes.

How do you differentiate between "more" in an algenric question like this. When we see a fraction more with large numbers, should we assume it's "more of the other person/variable" then just "more than the other person/variable" ? Appreciate anyone's calrification on this interpretation.
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by GMATDavid » Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:17 pm
The phrase 1/3 more means more by a factor of 1/3. That is, take 1/3 of 2400 and add that result to 2400. Thus, x would have 2400 + 800 or 3200.
Join the discussion

by ildude02 » Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:34 pm
So we say that it's 1/3 "of" because it's a fraction?At least that's what I would assume since there is no difference with the "usage" of more in both the sentences, apart from one being a fraction and the other an integer. Otherwise, we can as well consider "more of" for both of the sentences and that would lead to 1/3y and 300y. Thanks!
Join the discussion

by GMATDavid » Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:40 pm
Yes, I suppose it is weird in a way, but you are correct. When we want to describe a fractional relationship, we say 1/2 or 1/3 as many (fewer) and 1/2 or 1/3 more (for more).
Join the discussion