GMAT Prpep

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 468
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:17 pm
Thanked: 5 times

GMAT Prpep

by moneyman » Sun May 04, 2008 2:23 am
Is 1/p>r/r^2 + 2??

(1)p=r
(2)r>0

This is how I worked it out

1/p>r^2 + 2 is equal to Is r^2 + 2 > pr by cross multiplying..

(1) says that p=r so it is proved that r^2 + 2=r^2

but the answer is C

pls explain
Maxx
Source: — Problem Solving |

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Philadelphia
Thanked: 31 times
GMAT Score:640

by AleksandrM » Sun May 04, 2008 5:57 am
Never multiply or divide variables in inequalities because you do not know the sign of the variable, and therefore do not know whether to flip the sign. The first statement tells you that p is equal to r, but it does not tell you their signs. If the sign is positive, then the answer is yes, if it is negative then the answer is no, since the bigger the negative the smaller it is. The second statement tells you that one of the variables is positive, but you do not know what the other variable is. Taking the two statements together allows you to answer the question. Both are positive variables and p = r.

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:40 pm
Thanked: 2 times

by nipunkathuria » Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:19 am
AleksandrM wrote:Never multiply or divide variables in inequalities because you do not know the sign of the variable, and therefore do not know whether to flip the sign. The first statement tells you that p is equal to r, but it does not tell you their signs. If the sign is positive, then the answer is yes, if it is negative then the answer is no, since the bigger the negative the smaller it is. The second statement tells you that one of the variables is positive, but you do not know what the other variable is. Taking the two statements together allows you to answer the question. Both are positive variables and p = r.
As said A has be true...but since we have an expression involving 1/P(or after statement1 its 1/R) , we shd note that R!=0.
What i feel, rather that giving R>0 they should have given R!=0 or P!=0...

still the ambiguity of dividing by 0 is removed using (2) , hence the answer should be C