BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Important conceptual one (relative clause, relative pronoun)

Expert replies
by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:05 am
Could someone clarify which of the following setences are correct and why ?

This concept is going to clarify many doubt pertaining to many important cocepts used in official questions.

1. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider that dangled from the one clean bathroom towel.
2. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider dangled from the one clean bathroom towel.3.
3. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider, dangling from the one clean bathroom towel.
4. Dangling from the one clean bathroom towel, Michelle screamed when she saw the spider.

Please notice that in sentence 3 and 4, I have simply moved the position of modifier but making a significant difference in meaning. I agree for Q4 that position of modifier is incorrect illogicaly modifying Michelle .

Looking to know good explanation for 1, 2 and 3.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by uwhusky » Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:50 am
1. Although I think the grammar is correct, I believe in order for it to make sense, the relative clause should be in past progressive: Michelle screamed when she saw the spider that was dangling from the one clean bathroom towel.

2. Using the relative phrase: Michelle screamed when she saw the spider dangling from the one clean bathroom towel.

3. This construction is incorrect because Michelle is not dangling from the towel: Michelle screamed when she saw the spider, dangling from the one clean bathroom towel. The non-restrictive participial phrase "dangling from the towel" is an adverb, and it's saying that Michelle screamed when she saw the spider while Michelle was dangling from the clean towel.

4. It has the same error as 3 in terms of meaning, but the grammar itself is correct like 3.

So what do you think of the book so far?
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:58 am
GMATMadeEasy wrote:Could someone clarify which of the following setences are correct and why ?

This concept is going to clarify many doubt pertaining to many important cocepts used in official questions.

1. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider that dangled from the one clean bathroom towel.
2. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider dangled from the one clean bathroom towel.3.
3. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider, dangling from the one clean bathroom towel.
4. Dangling from the one clean bathroom towel, Michelle screamed when she saw the spider.

Please notice that in sentence 3 and 4, I have simply moved the position of modifier but making a significant difference in meaning. I agree for Q4 that position of modifier is incorrect illogicaly modifying Michelle .

Looking to know good explanation for 1, 2 and 3.
1. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider that dangled from the one clean bathroom towel. - Correct
The relative clause generally follows the word that it describes. Here, THAT is describing spider.

2. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider dangled from the one clean bathroom towel.3. - Wrong
...the spider dangled...does not look proper.
IMO : - Michelle screamed when she saw the spider dangling from the one clean bathroom towel. - correct construction

3. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider, dangling from the one clean bathroom towel..3 - Wrong
Comma+ING modifier shows some kind of consequence/effect of the main clause. Such a thing is not evident here.
Comma+ING is Adverbial modifier and NOT a noun modifier that can modify "spider" here.

4. Dangling from the one clean bathroom towel, Michelle screamed when she saw the spider..[/u]3 - Wrong
It seems as if Michelle is dangling..awkward
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:26 am
Wonderful explanation. One more question though :

2. Michelle screamed when she saw the spider dangled from the one clean bathroom towel.3. - Wrong
...the spider dangled...does not look proper.
IMO : - Michelle screamed when she saw the spider dangling from the one clean bathroom towel. - correct construction

Why do you say "does not look proper" what is grammatical explanation , i am trying to figure out proper grammatical rule so that the rule could be applied efficiently.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:44 am
"dangled" means that the spider is no longer dangling, and therefore progressive "dangling" is the correct phrase tense.

Also you should recognize that the participial phrase used in 2 is directly derived from the participial clause used in 1.

1: "Michelle screamed when she saw the spider that was dangling from the one clean bathroom towel."

2: "Michelle screamed when she saw the spider dangling from the one clean bathroom towel." - with relative pronoun and BE auxiliary verb removed.

So if 2 doesn't make sense, neither is 1.

The relationship between 3 and 4 is one of the same as well. The location of the non-restrictive clause whether in front or back has no bearing on its meaning in the construction.

So if 4 doesn't make sense, neither is 3.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1