Aboslute values

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

Aboslute values

by crackgmat007 » Fri May 08, 2009 8:47 am
Is |x|< 1?
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
(2) |x - 3| > 0

I get easily tricked by absolute value type of problems. Can anyone explain easy way to get around such type of problems? Is the answer for the above problem C?
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Fri May 08, 2009 11:03 am
1. I like to break my absolute value equations into cases, depending on the sign. Please keep in mind that:

If x is negative, then |x| = -x. Example: |-1| = -(-1) = 1.

If x is positive or equal to zero, then |x| = x. Example: |4| = 4.


You've got three cases with this one.
a. x < - 1 means that x + 1 < 0, so |x + 1| = -(x + 1). Since x < -1, then x - 1 will also be smaller than zero, so |x - 1| = -(x - 1).
This means that:
-x - 1 = -2x + 2
x = 3.

However, you need to back check: x = 3 is not consistent with your initial assumption that x < -1, so this one is out.

b. x is between -1 and 1. This means that x + 1 has turned positive, so |x + 1| = x + 1. However, x - 1 is still negative, so |x - 1| = -(x - 1).
You get that:
x + 1 = -2x + 2
3x = 1
x = 1/3 - is consistent with x between -1 and 1, so this one's a winner.

c. x is greater than 1, when all of them are positive. This means that:
x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = -1 - not consistent with x greater than 1, so this one's out too.
You've got only one solution for this one, and that's x = 1/3. For this one, |x| < 1. So 1 is sufficient.

2. Absolute values are always positive, with only one exception: the absolute value of zero is 0. This means that for all values except 0, |x - 3| > 0. So 2 is insufficient.

Answer A.

Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Fri May 08, 2009 11:31 am
thanks for the explaining... just a quick clarification: In the below step in 1.c, Actually -> x + 1 = 2x - 2 =>gives, x=3, which is consistent with the assumption. Hence statement 1 is not sufficient. Am I right to say that?

c. x is greater than 1, when all of them are positive. This means that:
x + 1 = 2x - 2
x = -1 - not consistent with x greater than 1, so this one's out too.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1169
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:34 am
Thanked: 25 times
Followed by:1 members

by aj5105 » Fri May 08, 2009 9:49 pm
Helpful!

Cramya’s post on inequality:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/general-ques ... 20342.html

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 2567
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:05 am
Thanked: 712 times
Followed by:550 members
GMAT Score:770

by DanaJ » Fri May 08, 2009 10:10 pm
Yeah, you're right. Then the answer will be indeed C.