singalong wrote:I've been pretty much winging it when it comes tom Inference based questions in RC.My accuracy is pretty good in specific detail, primary purpose questions compared to Inference.Any idea how I can improve it?I cannot help but go with my own intuition.Any/All tips are welcome.
I guess the first step is to try to figure out where you go wrong and why. When you look at the question explanation (assuming that you are working on materials that provide explanation), what do you see? why is the answer choice you choose wrong? Why is the right answer choice right? Analyze this and see if some pattern comes up. Usually the trap answer choices in inference questions take too big a step away from the text. For example, if someone walks into the room soaking wet, it would be too far fetched to infer that it is raining outside based only on the state of his clothes - it is possible that he just washed his car, fell into the pool, etc. GMAT inferences are pretty close to the text: if someone is wet, we can infer that he came in contact with some liquid of some sort, fairly recently.
check out
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2011/06/ ... n-of-terms
