BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

welfare fraud

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 amFollowed by: 4 members
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
GMAT Score:710
by rahulg83 » Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:09 am
The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare system to provide themselves with benefits is very small. But the widespread public outrage over such cases makes them tempting examples to use in arguments for severely limiting welfare programs. This is because these rare but extreme cases of welfare fraud help to harden public public attitude towards welfare effectively than standard cases, in which needy, law abiding individuals receive benefits.

The claims can best serve as a part of argument against the view that

A) Those who wish to change public attitudes towards welfare spending should focus public attention only on standard cases of welfare assistance.
B) A type of welfare fraud can both be common and lead to widespread public outrage.
C) The frequency with which a type of welfare fraud occurs is a good indicator of its effect on public opinions.
D) The public is only interested in standard cases of welfare fraud.
E) Cases of welfare fraud occur less often than cases in which welfare benefits are not fraudulently received.

OA D
I chose A. Please explain your reasoning. What am i missing here?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 10:32 am
Thanked: 1 times

by gauravkhare » Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:57 am
The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare system to provide themselves with benefits is very small. But the widespread public outrage over such cases makes them tempting examples to use in arguments for severely limiting welfare programs. This is because these rare but extreme cases of welfare fraud help to harden public public attitude towards welfare effectively than standard cases, in which needy, law abiding individuals receive benefits.

The claims can best serve as a part of argument against the view that

A) Those who wish to change public attitudes towards welfare spending should focus public attention only on standard cases of welfare assistance.
B) A type of welfare fraud can both be common and lead to widespread public outrage.
C) The frequency with which a type of welfare fraud occurs is a good indicator of its effect on public opinions.
D) The public is only interested in standard cases of welfare fraud.
E) Cases of welfare fraud occur less often than cases in which welfare benefits are not fraudulently received.

OA D
I chose A. Please explain your reasoning. What am i missing here?
_________________


The question stem is "against the view that". Hence we have to choose the option which is against the stimulus. Option A is not against. In fact the argument/ stimulus supports A. hence A is wrong.

Out of all options. D is the only one which is definitely opposed by the stimulus. Hence D is the correct answer.
gaurav
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:26 am
Location: Hong Kong

by fengjig » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:35 pm
I am with Rahulg83. And why A support the argument?

The whole argument perfectly weaken A

If to weaken D, the argument could simply be shortened into below

The number of cases in which prison inmates manipulate the welfare system to provide themselves with benefits is very small. But the public outrage over such cases are widespread and very intensive.

Can anyone elaborate?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:41 pm
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:770

by raghavsarathy » Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:23 pm
Definetly D

D states that People are only interested in standard cases of fraud. Implies- They are not worried about cases of fraud in welfare schemes happening in prisons.

Whereas the argument in the main statment is against this. Hence D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:55 am
Location: Hull, UK
Thanked: 1 times

by aspirant_gmat » Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:37 am
“But the widespread public outrage over such cases makes them tempting examples to use in arguments for severely limiting welfare programs.
This is because these rare but extreme cases of welfare fraud help to harden public attitude towards welfare effectively than standard cases, in which needy, law abiding individuals receive benefits.”

The argument asserts that public attitude is affected by welfare system fraud cases instead of standard cases where people are actually needy.

The claims can best serve as a part of argument against the view that

A) Those who wish to change public attitudes towards welfare spending should focus public attention only on standard cases of welfare assistance.

The claim is in favour of this argument; public attention should be focused on standard cases( instead of fraud cases) in order to change public attitude towards for welfare system.

However answer choice: D) The public is only interested in standard cases of welfare fraud- goes against the claim.

That's why the answer should be D.
Last edited by aspirant_gmat on Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:03 am

by pranav » Fri Jun 26, 2009 2:00 am
The question stem states that extreme cases of welfare fraud help to harden public public attitude towards welfare more effectively than standard cases

Hence, this can be used as an aurgument when someone states that public is only interested in standard cases of welfare fraud. (Statement D)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:02 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 5 times

by turbo jet » Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:24 pm
IMO:D

Paraphrase the argument
Author is saying that public get more outraged when prison inmates commit fraud in welfare programmes THAN when standard fraud cases take place. Read the last line carefully.


Hence D.A supports rather than opposing.
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:07 am

by micheal_kr » Sun May 15, 2016 11:01 pm
I also will choose A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1