Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

GMAT PREP Question (Population)

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 32 times

Re: GMAT PREP Question (Population)

by Vemuri » Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:30 am
I answered 10,800. Please help me understand where I went wrong

I avg the total number which came to 12,000 people per voting district. From this, I subtracted 10% (1,200) to get 10,800. I thought this is the lowest number.
Top
Join the discussion

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 amFollowed by: 355 members
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:34 am
bluementor wrote:Experts, I need some help here.

I agree with durgesh's solution above. However, when I attempted this question, I setup the equation as follows:

0.9x + 10x = 132,000
x = 10,900.

What's wrong with the equation that I've setup. I'm quite sure there's a fundamental concept that I'm just not seeing here. Could someone please explain this? Thanks.
It's the '0.9x' which isn't quite right. If one number is 10% larger than another, then the smaller number is not equal to 90% of the larger number. If one number is 90% of another number, then the larger number is actually 10/90 = 11.1% greater than the smaller number, as you can see by using the numbers 90 and 100.

I find Durgesh's approach more natural here, but it would certainly be possible to modify your approach to get the right answer. If x is the population of the larger districts, we want to know the population S of the smallest district:

S + 0.1S = x
S = (1/1.1)*x
S = (10/11)*x

That is, the population S is 90.909... % of x.

Now plug that into your equation in place of '0.9x':

(10/11)*x + 10x = 132,000
(120/11)*x = 132,000
x = 12,100

and S = 11,000.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:29 am
Thanked: 65 times

by bluementor » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:03 am
Ah, I see it now. It's the way percentages work:

When I add 10% to 90 I will get 99. But taking off 10% from 99 does not bring me back to 90.

Thanks Ian. As always, this is very helpful.

-BM-
Top
Join the discussion
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:29 am
Thanked: 65 times

by bluementor » Mon Mar 09, 2009 8:08 am
mals24 wrote:
bluementor wrote: 0.9x + 10x = 132,000
How did you come up with this equation, as in whats the logic behind it.

What Durgesh has done is that in order to minimize one variable you maximize all the other variables.

So the minimum value = x
population of the other 10 districts < 10% greater than x (1.1x)
since we need the maximum value, we'll take the population of the other 10 districts as = 1.1x

Equation should be x+ 1.1x*10 = 132,000
How did you get 0.9 and 10?
mals24,

Instead of assigning x to the minimum value (as what durgesh did), I have assigned to the maximum value. As Ian pointed out, I will need to use 10/11 instead of 0.9 if I wanted to use my equation, which is of course much more cumbersome.

-BM-
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 9:53 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 31 times

by mmslf75 » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:23 am
dferm wrote:A certain city with a population of 132,000 is to be divided into 11 voting districts, and no district is to have a population that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district. What is the minimum possible population that the least populated district could have?

A. 10,700
B. 10,800
C. 10,900
D. 11,000
E. 11,100

Can someone give a little light to this problem?

Thanks.
What kinda language is this ?
I fail to undersatnd watis being asked ?

that is more than 10 percent greater than the population of any other district
Top
Join the discussion
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:54 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 8 times

by valleeny » Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:01 pm
durgesh79 wrote: for x to be min, all other will have the same population equal to 1.1x
I cannot readily see this concept in a blink when it comes to this kind of question. Is there a concept or explanation that I have to understand for this?
Top
Join the discussion

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pmFollowed by: 694 members
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:36 am
You can try this article to see if it helps:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2009/11/ ... -problems
(The second problem discussed in the article is the voting districts problem above.)
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me
Top
Join the discussion
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:15 pm

by TheUT » Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:15 am
1.1 Min >= Max
For Min to be lowest
1.1 Min = Max

Min + 10 Max = 132000
12 Min = 132000
Min = 11K
Top
Join the discussion
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:12 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by SaraLotfy » Sat Oct 12, 2013 4:18 am
Can experts pleaaasseee confirm OA. Thx
Top
Join the discussion