Night reader wrote:r321 wrote:800guy wrote:In how many ways can 5 people sit around a circular table if one should not have the same neighbors in any two arrangements?
I only see two possible arrangement: ABCDE ('A' has neighbours 'B' & 'E') & ACEBD ('A' has neighbours 'C' & 'D').
Could some one please list out any of the other 10 arrangements because I don't see how they can be rearranged more than once without repeating neighbours.
@r321, AXB and BXA are considered two different arrangements with two different neighbors. According to this logic, the neighbors on the left and right sides are shifting (permuting); we have A-B-C-D-E and A-C-E-B-D as well as C-B-A-D-E, C-B-D-E-A ...
if we continue our selection from the possible (5-1)! circular combination set, we get exactly 12.
But the question clearly says "one should not have the same neighbours". If B has been seated adjacent to X (BXA) in one arrangement it can't be seated next to X again regardless of whether it's on the left or right of X, because being seated adjacent to X makes it a neighbour of X again.
BXA & AXB could be considered different if the question said something like "one should not have the same neighbours to the left/right"
Also, in A-B-C-D-E and C-B-A-D-E, D & E are being seated next to each other in the same clockwise order twice, which is not allowed according to my understanding of the restriction. The same applies for A-C-E-B-D and C-B-D-E-A, in which B & D are neighbours in the same clockwise order twice.
Maybe I'm failing to understand the logic here. If I am wrong please help me understand how by listing out the arrangements because I still don't see more than two possible arrangements considering the restrictions. I also do understand that these questions from the 'gmat MATH tough problems' doc are worded very poorly, which would never be the case with an official GMAT problem. Perhaps, the confusion over the different solutions to this problem is due to differing interpretations of the question.